1.) We have studied $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$ a great deal. In this problem we will consider a process in which a Z-boson mediates the interaction rather than a photon: $e^+e^- \to \nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu$ where $\nu_\mu$ is the \"muon neutrino\" and $\bar\nu_\mu$ is its anti-particle. The Feynman diagram for this process is similar to that of $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$ but with a massive Z-boson replacing the photon. The interaction Lagrangian for the Z couplings to electrons and neutrinos is given by: $\mathcal{L}_{int} = g \{ \bar\psi_e \gamma^\mu (v_e - a_e \gamma^5) \psi_e + \bar\psi_\nu \gamma^\mu (1 - \gamma^5) \psi_\nu \} Z_\mu$ where $\psi_e$ and $\psi_\nu$ are the electron and neutrino fields respectively, g is an overall coupling constant, and $a_e$ and $v_e$ are $\mathcal{O}(1)$ coefficients (you don't need their exact values right now). Take all the fermions as massless, but the Z-boson mass $M_Z$ must be retained. a.) Write down the matrix element for $e^+e^- \to \nu_\mu \bar\nu_\mu$. The propagator for a massive spin-1 particle is in the Feynman rule summary on Canvas, as are the vertex rules for interactions like these which involve $\gamma^5$. b.) Does the piece of the Z propagator proportional to $p^\mu p^\nu / M_Z^2$ contribute to the process? Explain. [Hint: remember the Dirac equation and what that means for u, v etc.] c.) Square the matrix element, average/sum over fermion spins, find the traces and evalu- ate them. You do not have to express your result in terms of Mandelstam variables if you don't want. You will need some identities beyond what we've used in QED. They are all listed in the lecture slides from Nov 28. d.) Find the differential cross section for the process, $d\sigma/dcos\theta$. Show that the cross section actually increases as a function of energy, at least for $\sqrt{s} \ll M_Z$. What happens if both $a_e$ and $v_e$ are nonzero?
Added by Michael P.
Close
Step 1
Step 1: Replace "e*e" with "e+e-" Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Sri K and 73 other Physics 103 educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Analysis of Error-Correction Models for VAR(1) Systems
Sri K.
-?? (Section 7.8) Consider the problem of a particle in finite square well of depth $U_{0}$, as described in Section 7.8. To solve this problem, use a coordinate system centered on the box, with the left edge of the well at $x=-a / 2$ and the right edge at $x=+a / 2 .$ From the symmetry of the potential, one can argue that the stationary states should have symmetric probability distributions, that is, $|\psi(x)|^{2}=|\psi(-x)|^{2}$. This implies that solutions are either symmetric and satisfy $\psi(x)=\psi(-x)$ or are antisymmetric and satisfy $\psi(x)=-\psi(-x)$. Thus, with our choice of coordinates, the solutions within the well are either of the form $\cos (k x)$ (for $n=1,3,5, \ldots)$ or of the form $\sin (k x)$ (for $n=2,4,6, \ldots)$. (a) For the case of the symmetric solutions, derive an equation relating $k$ and $\alpha$. [Hint: Using the boundary conditions that both $\psi(x)$ and $\psi^{\prime}(x)$ are continuous at $x=-a / 2$, you can produce two equations that relate $k, \alpha$, and the arbitrary coefficients $A$ and $G$ in Section 7.8. By dividing these equations, you can eliminate the coefficients. The final equation you produce is a transcendental equation relating $E$ and $U_{0}$; it cannot be solved for $E$ using elementary methods.] (b) Show that the equation derived in (a) produces the correct stationary-state energies in the limit $U_{0} \rightarrow \infty$. (c) Using numerical techniques, find the ground-state energy $E_{1}$ of a square well of depth $U_{0}=3 E_{1} .[$ Hint $:$ A simple trialand-error search for the solution works surprisingly well.]
The Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension
The Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation
Symmetric Column Vector Consider an inner product x·y = xGy on a matrix G = ( ; Find a linear transformation matrix Rc that satisfies the orthogonality condition with det € and e. 9 (Rcu u& for all 2 < [ column Hce That which respects the inner product. Hint: Rc should be given by the vector Rcu produces 2 41 Necessary orthogonal Yol MGTCI will be unique only up to a multiplicative constant. Rc = k ( : for some arbitrary nonzero constant. The entries when solving for must be independent, which could possibly be a couple remarks for your interest. TC not DCCesalt answering the above question. Remark column determinant (up sign) by imposing additional condition Koxlc When Il-Uc defined by Ilxlla (xx c (that HDAA that the rotation preserves the unit norm) need not find this constant. Remark When G Main JnIhis the 2 * identity matrix multiplicative constant). Luuae Recover the usual Euclidean inner product. Remark 3: Non-Euclidean inner products and non-relevant when the space Vui one-dimensional. Notice that =? flat surface. The Euclidean inner product can be replaced by non-Euclidean ones that reflect properties of the surface.
Adi S.
Recommended Textbooks
University Physics with Modern Physics
Physics: Principles with Applications
Fundamentals of Physics
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD