Much of the controversy over hydraulic fracturing is not about whether there are net benefits to society, but rather how the benefits and costs are distributed. Given the perceived costs to those adversely affected by hydraulic fracturing, it is not irrational that they would seek bans, especially in suburban areas where jobs in occupations unrelated to oil and gas are plentiful and pay reasonably well. For those suburban residents living near hydraulically fractured wells, the costs may outweigh the benefits.