00:01
Number one, what specifically is the root problem that social ecology tries to solve? how, for social ecology, is deep ecology part of that root problem? two, explain the difference between a utilitarian analysis of toxic waste issue and social justice analysis of the same issue.
00:20
How are these analysis different and how are they the same? and number three, explain, compare, and contrast, watson, wentz, and bookchain all use a model of community to establish moral status and value.
00:33
So let's start with question one.
00:41
Social ecology is the study of how organisms interact with the environment and how it responds to them and how these interactions will affect the society and the surrounding environment.
02:13
Social ecology tries to solve social roots and implications of ecological dislocation.
02:51
Deep ecology is an environment, philosophical, and social movement that regards human life as just one of many equal components of a global ecosystem.
04:01
Deep ecology is part of the root problem for social ecology because deep ecologists favor controlling human population, growth that human population growth that limits economic and technological growth, thereby reducing food and energy consumption.
05:59
Question two, utilitarian analysis is an approach that is used to assess an action in terms of its consequences.
06:50
Therefore, utilitarian analysis of toxic waste issue is the approach that assesses the toxic waste by considering the utility and the outcomes.
07:55
Social justice analysis refers to a theory that focuses on relations, fairness between individuals and society, and equal access.
08:47
To social privileges...