Question

Example 1-2. According to the relaxed definition, the error in our measurement of me is (9.15 - 9.11) × 10?³¹ kg = 0.04 × 10?³¹ kg. Notice that the accepted value of me was rounded up to 9.11 × 10?³¹ kg because it would be pointless to use more significant figures in the accepted value than there are in the measured value. There is a belief that quantities such as the mass of an electron have a true value and perfecting the measurement process would give better and better approximations to this true value. In contrast, there are many examples in which a true value is unknown because the value is not well defined. For example, the thickness of a block is unknown since even a very highly polished block has rough surfaces when viewed at high magnification. Therefore, the distance from one side is not well defined and improving the measuring instruments beyond some point would do no good. 2. Relative error is the error in a quantity divided by the quantity. 3. Uncertainty means the estimated reliability of a value. There are various ways to make this estimate and the main purpose of this first "experiment" is to gain skill in evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Thus, the figure 0.0000054 × 10?³¹ kg in the above-quoted mass of the electron is the uncertainty. 4. Relative uncertainty is the uncertainty in a value divided by the value. It may be expressed as a fractional decimal or as a percentage. Exercise 1-1. Find the relative uncertainty in the mass of the electron. 5. Discrepancy means the difference between two measured values of a quantity. We shall measure the value of the acceleration due to gravity, g, several times during the semester. Suppose that we get g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s² using two techniques. The discrepancy in the two values is 0.105 m/s². In the Appendix on p. 101, we find the accepted value of g = 9.797 m/s² for Northridge. Exercise 1-2. What are the errors in the measured values g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s²? The relative errors?

          Example 1-2. According to the relaxed definition, the error in our measurement of me is
(9.15 - 9.11) × 10?³¹ kg = 0.04 × 10?³¹ kg.
Notice that the accepted value of me was rounded up to 9.11 × 10?³¹ kg because it would be pointless to use more significant figures in the accepted value than there are in the measured value.
There is a belief that quantities such as the mass of an electron have a true value and perfecting the measurement process would give better and better approximations to this true value. In contrast, there are many examples in which a true value is unknown because the value is not well defined. For example, the thickness of a block is unknown since even a very highly polished block has rough surfaces when viewed at high magnification. Therefore, the distance from one side is not well defined and improving the measuring instruments beyond some point would do no good.
2. Relative error is the error in a quantity divided by the quantity.
3. Uncertainty means the estimated reliability of a value. There are various ways to make this estimate and the main purpose of this first "experiment" is to gain skill in evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Thus, the figure 0.0000054 × 10?³¹ kg in the above-quoted mass of the electron is the uncertainty.
4. Relative uncertainty is the uncertainty in a value divided by the value. It may be expressed as a fractional decimal or as a percentage.
Exercise 1-1. Find the relative uncertainty in the mass of the electron.
5. Discrepancy means the difference between two measured values of a quantity. We shall measure the value of the acceleration due to gravity, g, several times during the semester. Suppose that we get g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s² using two techniques. The discrepancy in the two values is 0.105 m/s². In the Appendix on p. 101, we find the accepted value of g = 9.797 m/s² for Northridge.
Exercise 1-2. What are the errors in the measured values g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s²? The relative errors?
        
Show more…
Example 1-2. According to the relaxed definition, the error in our measurement of me is
(9.15 - 9.11) × 10?³¹ kg = 0.04 × 10?³¹ kg.
Notice that the accepted value of me was rounded up to 9.11 × 10?³¹ kg because it would be pointless to use more significant figures in the accepted value than there are in the measured value.
There is a belief that quantities such as the mass of an electron have a true value and perfecting the measurement process would give better and better approximations to this true value. In contrast, there are many examples in which a true value is unknown because the value is not well defined. For example, the thickness of a block is unknown since even a very highly polished block has rough surfaces when viewed at high magnification. Therefore, the distance from one side is not well defined and improving the measuring instruments beyond some point would do no good.
2. Relative error is the error in a quantity divided by the quantity.
3. Uncertainty means the estimated reliability of a value. There are various ways to make this estimate and the main purpose of this first "experiment" is to gain skill in evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Thus, the figure 0.0000054 × 10?³¹ kg in the above-quoted mass of the electron is the uncertainty.
4. Relative uncertainty is the uncertainty in a value divided by the value. It may be expressed as a fractional decimal or as a percentage.
Exercise 1-1. Find the relative uncertainty in the mass of the electron.
5. Discrepancy means the difference between two measured values of a quantity. We shall measure the value of the acceleration due to gravity, g, several times during the semester. Suppose that we get g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s² using two techniques. The discrepancy in the two values is 0.105 m/s². In the Appendix on p. 101, we find the accepted value of g = 9.797 m/s² for Northridge.
Exercise 1-2. What are the errors in the measured values g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s²? The relative errors?

Added by Stephanie C.

Close

University Physics with Modern Physics
University Physics with Modern Physics
Hugh D. Young 14th Edition
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Example 1-2. According to the relaxed definition, the error in our measurement of me is (9.15 - 9.11) × 10⁻³¹ kg = 0.04 × 10⁻³¹ kg. Notice that the accepted value of me was rounded up to 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg because it would be pointless to use more significant figures in the accepted value than there are in the measured value. There is a belief that quantities such as the mass of an electron have a true value and perfecting the measurement process would give better and better approximations to this true value. In contrast, there are many examples in which a true value is unknown because the value is not well defined. For example, the thickness of a block is unknown since even a very highly polished block has rough surfaces when viewed at high magnification. Therefore, the distance from one side is not well defined and improving the measuring instruments beyond some point would do no good. 2. Relative error is the error in a quantity divided by the quantity. 3. Uncertainty means the estimated reliability of a value. There are various ways to make this estimate and the main purpose of this first "experiment" is to gain skill in evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Thus, the figure 0.0000054 × 10⁻³¹ kg in the above-quoted mass of the electron is the uncertainty. 4. Relative uncertainty is the uncertainty in a value divided by the value. It may be expressed as a fractional decimal or as a percentage. Exercise 1-1. Find the relative uncertainty in the mass of the electron. 5. Discrepancy means the difference between two measured values of a quantity. We shall measure the value of the acceleration due to gravity, g, several times during the semester. Suppose that we get g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s² using two techniques. The discrepancy in the two values is 0.105 m/s². In the Appendix on p. 101, we find the accepted value of g = 9.797 m/s² for Northridge. Exercise 1-2. What are the errors in the measured values g = 9.910 m/s² and 9.805 m/s²? The relative errors?
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Kathleen Carty Danielle Fairburn
Jennifer Stoner verified

Cyra Jelle Calleja and 55 other subject Physics 101 Mechanics educators are ready to help you.

Ask a new question

*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Key Concept
Premium Feature
Explore the core concept behind this problem.
Play button
Key Concept
Premium Feature
Explore the core concept behind this problem.
Your browser does not support the video tag.

*

Recommended Videos

-
measurement-errors-measurements-are-associated-with-errors-or-uncertainties-and-for-that-reason-we-report-only-the-appropriate-number-of-significant-digits-for-example-if-our-uncertainty-qua-79644

Measurement errors Measurements are associated with errors or uncertainties and for that reason we report only the appropriate number of significant digits. For example, if our uncertainty in a quantity is in the hundredths place such as ±0.05 m, there is no reason to report the thousandths place so we would round 8.377 m to 8.38 m. Errors could be either random or systematic. If you measure the length of a pencil as a single piece of data three times you may read or record three slightly different answers. Each measurement is independent of the other and the error associated with that is called a random error. If the meterstick has an error in its calibration that affects all the data, this is called a systematic error. These errors affect the final outcome of the experiment. Linear relationships - Straight line graphs In experiments we investigate how two or more quantities are related to each other. If two quantities are linearly dependent on each other, then the relationship between the two is linear and can be represented by a straight line. Since it is familiar to us, let's consider two variables, x and y, that are linearly related. Where x is the independent variable and y is the dependent variable. The equation representing the relationship is written as y = mx + b where the slope is m and the intercept is b. If we measure data for x and y, then plot y versus x, we should see a linear trend for the data. If x and y are normally distributed random variables, then we can use a statistical procedure to calculate the slope and the intercept of the equation. The relevant statistical procedure is called the Least Squares Method (LSM). The LSM provides ways to calculate both the value and its error or uncertainty for slope and uncertainty. Part B: Experiment In our first experiment we will use length measurements to calculate the value of π. You will calculate the value of π with its uncertainty and compare with the known standard value. C = 2πR where C is circumference and R is radius. Predictions 1. If we measure the circumference and radius of a variety of circular objects and then plot circumference vs. radius, will the data fall exactly on a straight line? Why or why not? No. This is because the radius and circumference have two different measurements. The radius is the distance from the circle to its perimeter, and the circumference is the distance once around the circle. Thus, the data for the radius and circumference will be different plotted on a line graph. 2. What do you expect the slope of the line to be equal to? Explain why. 3. What do you expect the intercept of the line to be equal to? Explain why.

Cyra Jelle C.

number-of-decimal-places-of-all-the-numbers-used-in-the-calculation-the-term-precision-refers-to-the-number-of-precision-digits-in-a-measurement-the-precision-of-measurement-is-determined-by-65838

The term precision refers to the number of decimal places of all the numbers used in the calculation. The precision of a measurement is determined by the instrument used and the skill of the person using it. In a normal lab, we would use instruments of different precision. In each case, you should get the most precision (significant figures) possible from each instrument you use. The smallest marked division on an instrument is called the least count. Whenever possible, you should read or estimate between the lines of the smallest divisions. This extra digit is called the fractional part. Accuracy refers to how close a measurement matches the actual value of that quantity. A measuring instrument must be correctly calibrated and properly used to yield measurements of high accuracy. In general, the accuracy of a measurement can be improved by making several measurements and calculating the average. The range of values that encompasses the calculated average can be used to express the uncertainty of the measurement. Suppose the following three measurements were taken (24.3 cm, 23.8 cm, and 24.8 cm). The result could be expressed as the average value in cm. Uncertainty: The level of confidence in the accuracy of a measurement can be expressed in terms of the uncertainty of the measurement. The uncertainty of measurement is expressed as a range of values that the experimenter believes includes the actual or true value of the measured quantity. For example, a measurement of 16.4 +- 0.5 cm (centimeters) has an uncertainty of +/- 0.5 cm. The actual or true value is expected to lie between 15.0 cm and 16.9 cm.

Krishna G.

a-common-method-for-estimating-engel-curves-is-to-model-expenditure-shares-as-a-function-of-total-ex

A common method for estimating Engel curves is to model expenditure shares as a function of total expenditure, and possibly demographic variables. A common specification has the form $s g o o d=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1}$ ltotexpend $+$ demographics $+u$ where sgood is the fraction of spending on a particular good out of total expenditure and ltotexpend is the log of total expenditure. The sign and magnitude of $\beta$ are of interest across various expenditure categories. To account for the potential endogeneity of ltotexpend-which can be viewed as an omitted variables or simultaneous equations problem, or both - the log of family income is often used as an instrumental variable. Let lincome denote the log of family income. For the remainder of this question, use the data in EXPENDSHARES, which comes from Blundell, Duncan, and Pendakur $(1998) .$ (i) Use sfood, the share of spending on food, as the dependent variable. What is the range of values of sfood? Are you surprised there are no zeros? (ii) Estimate the equation sfood $=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1}$ltotexpend$+\beta_{2} a g e+\beta_{3} k i d s+u$ by OLS and report the coefficient on ltotexpend, $\hat{\beta}_{O L S, 1},$ along with its heteroskedasticity-robust standard error. Interpret the result. (iii) Using lincome as an IV for ltotexpend, estimate the reduced form equation for ltotexpend; be sure to include age and kids. Assuming lincome is exogenous in $(16.43),$ is lincome a valid IV for ltotexpend? (iv) Now estimate $(16.43)$ by instrumental variables. How does $\hat{\beta}_{I V, 1}$ compare with $\hat{\beta}_{o l s, 1} ?$ What about the robust 95$\%$ confidence intervals? (v) Use the test in Section $15-5$ to test the null hypothesis that ltotexpend is exogenous in $(16.43) .$ Be sure to report and interpret the $p$ -value. Are there any overidentifying restrictions to test? (vi) Substitute salcohol for sfood in $(16.43)$ and estimate the equation by OLS and 2 $\mathrm{SLS.Now~what}$ do you find for the coefficients on ltotexpend?

Introductory Econometrics


*

Recommended Textbooks

-
University Physics with Modern Physics

University Physics with Modern Physics

Hugh D. Young 14th Edition
achievement 1,952 solutions
Physics: Principles with Applications

Physics: Principles with Applications

Douglas C. Giancoli 7th Edition
achievement 1,684 solutions
Fundamentals of Physics

Fundamentals of Physics

David Halliday, Robert Resnick , Jearl Walker 10th Edition
achievement 1,832 solutions

*

Transcript

-
00:01 Okay, first you have to find the relative uncertainty in the mass of the electron.
00:07 So the formula for relative uncertainty is the uncertainty in a value divided by that value.
00:24 We are given uncertainty of the mass of the electron, which is this, an accepted value of electron, which is this.
00:50 Then we can find that relative uncertainty is equals.
00:54 2.
00:59 Next, the second question as for the errors in the relative errors.
01:04 The formula for error is this.
01:06 The difference of the measured, if the accepted.
01:17 You have a measured, first for measured value of 9 .910 per second square.
01:23 This is the error...
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever