00:01
Okay, so i see that you need help with this question.
00:02
It says, here we are confronted with a capital murder trial, one in which the prospects for the other maneuvers to counter such evidence overall.
00:18
We intend to discredit ms.
00:21
Smith by asking her under oath.
00:23
So discredit ms.
00:27
Smith by asking her under oath if it is or is not true she is a prostitute and dealer and illegal drugs prostitute and dealer of drugs our aim here is to play upon the ego statistical egotistical, egotistical conscience of a certain juror.
01:05
Okay.
01:06
So egotistical conscience of juror, mr.
01:19
Jones by name, hoping he will vote not guilty in this case because he fundamentally wishes to avoid the embarrassment of having to admit his wife, his children, his business associates and his religious colleagues that he in practical effect voted to execute our client based on the testimony of moral corrupt in debias witness so avoid embarrassment okay um think here as would a judge in such an instance questions to be answered in the continuous pros what kinds of seemingly damning factual evidence could the prosecutor bring against our client what are the advantages and disadvantages of the prosecution bringing forward the eyewitness miss smith what makes bringing forward eyewitness testimony a risky maneuver if the prosecution is to prevail is there any particular kind of reasoning that the prosecution must use to organize and present all the damning factual evidence mentioned above can the evidence in play be cast in another reasoning that the defense could use in such a way in such a way as to dismiss or jeopardize the value of all parts of the evidence when miss miss character is attacked which fallacy of relevance is involved what should be the reaction of the prosecutor to this effort.
03:12
Okay.
03:13
So first of all, taking a look at these.
03:20
Okay.
03:20
So the first thing that you need to do is identify the seemingly damning factual evidence the prosecutor could bring against the client.
03:29
The client could bring forward various types of evidence against the client in capital this might be forensic evidence such as dna, fingerprints or blood stains linking the client to the scene of the crime, digital evidence from phones or computers showing communications or searches related to the crime scene, eyewitness testimony, and incriminating statements or confessions.
04:28
Each of the evidence aims to establish the client's presence at the crime scene, motive, opportunity, and actual commission of the crime.
04:40
Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the prosecution bringing forward the eyewitness.
04:45
So advantages, eyewitness testimony can be compelling and persuasive to the jury.
05:00
If the witness appears credible and confident, mismissed direct account of the events could provide a narrative that aligns with the physical evidence and strengthen the prosecution's case disadvantages...