Based on his experiment with capuchin monkeys and grapes versus cucumber rewards forgratitude.exchanging stones, de Waal reasoned that a sense of fairness originated in the emotion ofO TrueO False
Added by Lisa G.
Step 1
Let's think step by step. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Suman K and 58 other Psychology educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Frans de Waal's research revealed that capuchins are capable of understanding equal payment, dividing food resources equally in a group, extracting food from hidden resources, and making and using tools.
Suman K.
Robert Trivers argued that emotions like Guilt, Pride, Honor, Moralistic Aggression, Trust, and others evolved as a response to reciprocal altruism. What do you think? Do you think we evolved emotions so we could be successful evolutionarily? Are we reactive organisms or can we make conscience choices to act in contrary to our evolutionary history?
Adi S.
From the information below: There is evidence that the great apes can produce gestures that refer to external entities. a) True b) False In the visual domain, primates use a range of facial displays and body part movements as communication signals, sometimes combined with tactile components. Gorilla chest beating and Rhesus monkeys bared-teeth displays are examples of how different species express social rank with visual signals. Current research has focused much on gestures, which are interesting because of their partly flexible, partly species-specific use in a variety of social contexts. Gestures have been studied mainly in great apes, where considerable variation between individuals and groups has been found. Whether some of this variation is socially learned and thus potentially ‘cultural’ is still an unresolved question. A more established finding is that, during gesturing, apes take into account each other's attention and deploy their signals accordingly (Call & Tomasello 2007; Figure 1). Interestingly, however, there is almost no evidence that primate gestures, or combinations thereof, carry symbolic meaning by referring to external entities (Cartmill & Byrne 2010). Instead, they appear to function primarily to facilitate ongoing social interactions, to bond with others, or to persuade others to behave in a desired way. Another feature of human communication is that speech acts can be symbolic by referring to both mental entities and events in the outside world. Furthermore, humans make ample use of indexical and iconic signals, such as pointing or pantomiming, and from an early age, infants understand that symbolic and indexical signals complement each other in their capacity to refer to external objects (Gliga & Csibra 2009). Although laboratory research has shown that great apes can learn a considerable number of arbitrary symbols and follow indexical signals, there is little evidence that they use such acquired skills in creative ways or when communicating with each other (e.g., Savage-Rumbaugh et al. 1986).
Recommended Textbooks
Psychology Openstax
Myers' Psychology for AP
Psychology
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD