00:01
Hello students, the question is, in the ethics of what we eat, singer and mason discuss the conscientious omnivore and the best defense for eating meat, an argument that attributes to writers such as michael pollan.
00:25
Briefly, we have to describe the main points of the argument and why it is claimed by some to be ethically more acceptable case for animal agriculture.
00:38
And we have to give our opinion too.
00:41
If we see the best defense argument for eating meat, it is discussed by singer and mason in ethics of what we eat.
00:53
Humans have evolved to eat meat and that is, that it is therefore natural and necessary for their health.
01:05
It is necessary for their health.
01:08
It emphasizes in supporting the small -scale substantial and human -animal agricultures, agricultural practices as opposed to the factory farming...