00:06
Part a, the showing of a movie in a public is good because showing a movie in room neither excludable and not tribal.
00:16
That is, a roommate cannot be prevented from watching the movie and the one person enjoyment of movie does not reduce other roommate's ability to enjoy it.
00:29
So part b is, the part b will be the total cost of movie is total.
00:40
Cost of movie is $8 to 2, which makes it 16.
00:48
The total value of the roommate is the total valuation is the total valuation is jude willingness is 7 first claim and second flame from this is from the table and and joe's willingness for the first film and second program and this willingness is three and two for the first and second film and tim's willingness is again two and one the person second film which makes it $30.
01:35
The total surplus will be total winningness which is three minutes total cost is 16 which is $14.
01:49
We can see from that we can see from the table that renting three movies can maximize the total success.
02:00
Now part c if they choose to rent three movies the total cost of the movie will be $24.
02:08
If you split this cost equally each person shares total cost by number of thousands.
02:23
It's $24 is a total cost number of person, 4 person.
02:28
So $1 .6 per person.
02:32
Par d, a possible to ensure that everyone benefit would be to be ensure that everyone gets the same surplus from three movies.
02:54
Suppose the surplus is x, then the cost shared, this willingness to pay minus x.
03:01
For example, when in renting three movies, jules ' willingness to pay is $7 plus 6 plus 5, which is $18.
03:14
We already know that the total cost of the movie is $24.
03:18
This week and have the following equation with x as unknown.
03:22
It is 18 minus x plus 12, minus x plus 6, minus x plus 3, minus x, plus 3 minus x, which is 39 minus 4x.
03:38
Just $24...