00:02
The first statement is false.
00:14
While both methods, weightedly squares and robust standard errors, are used to alleviate the problem of heteroscadisticity, where the error terms have different variants.
00:31
The two methods are very different.
00:34
I can make a quick comparison as follows.
00:45
Weighted list square requires the data.
00:48
To be transformed.
01:00
And so it produces a very different result to ols.
01:17
Meanwhile, for the method of robust standard error, no data transformation is needed and the estimates you get from robust standard error are the same as ols.
01:47
The only difference is the standard the standard error is become larger.
02:04
Weighted list square is actually an older methodology, and robust standard error is now popular.
02:14
One reason why weighted list square is not very popular is because it requires a strong assumption of the structure of the covariance variance matrix.
02:28
For robust standard error, we do have some assumption, but the assumption is much more relaxed.
03:03
So we can say this method is less restrictive.
03:11
That is part one.
03:13
And for the second statement, this is false.
03:23
When we have omitted variable problem, you need...
03:30
It's better to have instrumental variables.
03:43
Actually, i can put this as uncertain because proxy variable can help with omitted variable bias.
04:08
So i will give a comparison between instrumental variable and proxy variable.
04:19
Anyway, instrumental variable is a more standard way to deal with the omitted variable bias.
04:31
Okay, so you need a proxy variable when your variable of interest, let's say x, is either poorly measured or an observed.
05:14
And you will have an instrumental variable when your x is endogenous.
05:29
There are several reasons that x can be endogenous and you should look up in.
05:35
In your textbook.
05:40
So the proxy variable can help with omitted variable bias by replacing the unobserved x.
06:14
The instrumental variable will help with omitted variable bias, will help reduce this bias by ruling out the endogenous part of x.
06:46
And the last difference, a good proxy variable should be a good representation of x and should be correlated with the outcome variable.
06:58
The proxy should be able to explain the outcome variable.
07:08
Let's say the outcome variable denoted y...