00:01
Okay, so i see that you need help with this question.
00:04
So examine the following studies and decide whether the study is a, exempt, b, eligible for expedited review, or c, needs full review by an irb committee.
00:16
So before deciding on the category for each study, it's important to understand each category means.
00:22
Exempt means research activities that present minimal risk to participants and fit specific categories defined by federal regulations.
00:28
These do not require ongoing irb oversight.
00:35
Expedited review means research activities that involve no more than minimal risk to participants and fit within certain criterias.
00:44
These require review by the irb chair or a diagnosed reviewer rather than the full board.
00:52
Full review, research activities that involve more than minimal risk to participants or do not fit within the exempt or expedited categories.
01:02
These require a full irb committee.
01:05
So for number one, as part of a class assignment, students will survey other students about their sleep and exercise habits.
01:13
This study likely involves minimal risk and may be considered exempt from if the information is recorded in such a manner that human subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers.
01:25
So this would be a exempt.
01:32
Number two a researcher is interested in the effects of social influence on public compliance participants will be seated in a room with two other people and shown images of lines of differing light lengths they will be asked to estimate whether the length lines match in length unbeknownst to the participant two confederates of the study will consistently provide wrong answers.
01:59
This study involves a deception.
02:01
It may require an expedited review to ensure that the deception is justified and the participants are not exposed more than the minimal risk.
02:12
So b.
02:16
Okay then number three.
02:21
A researcher proposes to use data from a colleague's database to conduct secondary analysis...