ignore the second graph that is for a different question, the remainder of part d sentence is under the second graph thank you!
Coffee
Y/Pc]
Uo
Y,/P
Turkish toast
Part (e): Suppose you're back at your initial equilibrium, s, shown in the graph below. Now suppose the price of coffee instead increases from P', to P and suppose that the price of turkish toast is $1 so that you can interpret the x-axis both in terms of turkish toast consumption and in terms of money income. Using the graph below (or recreating it on your own), illustrate your new equilibrium consumption choice of coffee and turkish toast. Label the new equilibrium, b, new quantity demanded of coffee, C, and your new level of utility, U. Do you buy more or less coffee? Does your welfare (utility level) increase or decrease?
Part (d): What is the compensating variation (CV) of the price increase in coffee - i.e. given the price of coffee, how much does your income need to change in order for you to maintain your original level of utility, Uo? Does your income need to increase or decrease? Does this imply a willingness to pay (WTP) or a willingness to accept compensation (WTA) for the price increase? Illustrate the CV on your graph. Label the consumption bundle that achieves your original level of utility at the new prices, d, your new consumption of coffee, C, and the associated income level, Y.