In a prisoner's dilemma: One competitor gains at the expense of another All competing parties lose. All competing parties gain. One competitor loses.
Added by Andrew R.
Close
Step 1
The Prisoner's Dilemma is a classic example in game theory that demonstrates why two individuals might not cooperate even if it appears to be in their best interests to do so. It involves two prisoners who are interrogated separately and must decide whether to Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Rashmi Sinha and 98 other Microeconomics educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
The prisoners' dilemma is a two-person game illus- trating that a. the cooperative outcome could be worse for both people than the Nash equilibrium. b. even if the cooperative outcome is better than the Nash equilibrium for one person, it might be worse for the other. c. even if cooperation is better than the Nash equilib- rium, each person might have an incentive not to cooperate. d. rational, self-interested individuals will naturally avoid the Nash equilibrium because it is worse for both of them.
Rashmi S.
Recommended Textbooks
Principles of Economics
Principles of Microeconomics for AP® Courses
Economics
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD