00:01
Let's discuss the answers of each of the cases provided.
00:04
Now regarding the first case that is karla, karla was using the angering and adjustment heuristic when she adjusted her estimate of game attendance from 23 ,000 to that of 30 ,000 based on the anger provided by the previous week's attendance.
00:22
So i'll help you with this case first.
00:23
Karla was using, karla was using the angering and, the angering and, angering and adjustment heuristic, adjustment heuristic, adjustment heuristic when, highlighting this answer over here, when she adjusted, when she adjusted her estimate of, her estimate of game attendance, game attendance from 23 ,000, from 23 ,000 to 30 ,000, to 30 ,000 based on, based on the anger provided by, on the anger provided by, provided by the previous week's attendance, by the previous week's attendance, week's attendance.
01:59
So this is the first case.
02:02
Moving on to the second case and that was regarding judge judy who inadvertently biased the jurors via the angering and adjustment heuristic here also again and this was when she instructed them to consider the harshest verdict first in their deliberations.
02:18
So let me also help with this over here...