00:01
This question asks us to match the supreme court case with the corresponding descriptor.
00:07
So let's start out with the first, which is arizona v.
00:16
U .s., 2012.
00:18
So this one matches with undocumented immigrants residing or working in the u .s.
00:25
This is because this ruling was based on the fact that it said a state can't go and kind of overrun the federal regulations.
00:41
So the state can't enforce a law that would be in conflict with the federal law.
00:47
So this corresponds with number six.
00:50
And then we move on to shelley v.
00:52
Kramer.
01:02
And shelley v.
01:03
Kramer corresponds with number four, private restrictive real estate covenants.
01:10
And that is because it was a ruling that said that it was unconstitutional to have a covenant that would, this covenant would be with regards to housing and real estate.
01:26
So it would be unconstitutional for a covenant to basically discriminate in a real estate contract based on race.
01:39
So this is number four.
01:41
And then we move on to worcester v.
01:46
Georgia.
01:47
And this one corresponds to number one, which looks like it's actually choice a.
02:02
So we'll just say one, but put in parentheses a.
02:05
And that's because it ruled saying that it is not right for people who are non -native american to gain entrance to the tribal lands without the tribe's permission...