Question

7:08 PM M \( 11^{46} .11 .\left..1\right|^{31.3} \) 87 Edit Easily add text in PDF Add It so happens that every solution to the (time-dependent) Schrödinger equation can be written in this form-it is simply a matter of finding the right constants \( \left(c_{1}, c_{2}, \ldots\right) \) so as to fit the initial conditions for the problem at hand. You'll see in the following sections how all this works out in practice, and in Chapter 3 we'll put it into more elegant language, but the main point is this: Once you've solved the time-independent \( { }^{5} \triangle \) linear combination of the functions \( f_{1}(z), f_{2}(z), \ldots \) is an expression of the form \[ f(z)=c_{1} f_{1}(z)+c_{2} f_{2}(z)+\cdots \] where \( c_{1}, c_{2}, \ldots \) are any (complex) constants. hap. 2 The Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation Schrödinger equation, you're essentially done; getting from there to the general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is simple and straightforward. *Problem 2.1 Prove the following theorems: (a) For normalizable solutions, the separation constant \( E \) must be real. Hint: Write \( E \) (in Equation 2.6) as \( E_{0}+i \Gamma \) (with \( E_{0} \) and \( \Gamma \) real), and show that if Equation 1.20 is to hold for all \( t, \Gamma \) must be zero. (b) \( \psi \) can always be taken to be real (unlike \( \Psi \), which is necessarily complex). Note: This doesn't mean that every solution to the timc-independent Schrödinger equation is real; what it says is that if you've got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions (with the same energy) that are. So in Equation 2.14 you might as well stick to \( \psi \) 's that are real. Hint: If \( \psi(x) \) satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given \( E \), so too does its complex conjugate, and hence also the real linear combinations \( \left(\psi+\psi^{*}\right) \) and \( i\left(\psi-\psi^{*}\right) \). (c) If \( V(x) \) is an even function [i.e., \( V(-x)=V(x) \) ], then \( \psi(x) \) can always be taken to be either even or odd. IIint: If \( \psi(x) \) satisfics the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given \( E \), so too does \( \psi(-x) \), and hence also the even and odd linear combinations \( \psi(x) \pm \psi(-x) \). \( * \overline{\text { Problem 2.2 Show that } E \text { must exceed the minimum value of } V(x) \text { for every }} \) normalizable solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation. What is the classical analog to this statement? Hint: Rewrite Equation 2.4 in the form \[ \frac{d^{2} \psi}{d x^{2}}=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}[V(x)-E] \psi \] if \( E<V_{\min } \), then \( \psi \) and its second derivative always have the same sign-argue that such a function cannot be normalized. THE INFINITE SOUARE WELL

          7:08 PM M
\( 11^{46} .11 .\left..1\right|^{31.3} \)
87
Edit
Easily add text in PDF
Add
It so happens that every solution to the (time-dependent) Schrödinger equation can be written in this form-it is simply a matter of finding the right constants \( \left(c_{1}, c_{2}, \ldots\right) \) so as to fit the initial conditions for the problem at hand. You'll see in the following sections how all this works out in practice, and in Chapter 3 we'll put it into more elegant language, but the main point is this: Once you've solved the time-independent
\( { }^{5} \triangle \) linear combination of the functions \( f_{1}(z), f_{2}(z), \ldots \) is an expression of the form
\[
f(z)=c_{1} f_{1}(z)+c_{2} f_{2}(z)+\cdots
\]
where \( c_{1}, c_{2}, \ldots \) are any (complex) constants.
hap. 2 The Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation
Schrödinger equation, you're essentially done; getting from there to the general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is simple and straightforward.
*Problem 2.1 Prove the following theorems:
(a) For normalizable solutions, the separation constant \( E \) must be real. Hint: Write \( E \) (in Equation 2.6) as \( E_{0}+i \Gamma \) (with \( E_{0} \) and \( \Gamma \) real), and show that if Equation 1.20 is to hold for all \( t, \Gamma \) must be zero.
(b) \( \psi \) can always be taken to be real (unlike \( \Psi \), which is necessarily complex). Note: This doesn't mean that every solution to the timc-independent Schrödinger equation is real; what it says is that if you've got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions (with the same energy) that are. So in Equation 2.14 you might as well stick to \( \psi \) 's that are real. Hint: If \( \psi(x) \) satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given \( E \), so too does its complex conjugate, and hence also the real linear combinations \( \left(\psi+\psi^{*}\right) \) and \( i\left(\psi-\psi^{*}\right) \).
(c) If \( V(x) \) is an even function [i.e., \( V(-x)=V(x) \) ], then \( \psi(x) \) can always be taken to be either even or odd. IIint: If \( \psi(x) \) satisfics the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given \( E \), so too does \( \psi(-x) \), and hence also the even and odd linear combinations \( \psi(x) \pm \psi(-x) \).
\( * \overline{\text { Problem 2.2 Show that } E \text { must exceed the minimum value of } V(x) \text { for every }} \) normalizable solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation. What is the classical analog to this statement? Hint: Rewrite Equation 2.4 in the form
\[
\frac{d^{2} \psi}{d x^{2}}=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}[V(x)-E] \psi
\]
if \( E<V_{\min } \), then \( \psi \) and its second derivative always have the same sign-argue that such a function cannot be normalized.
THE INFINITE SOUARE WELL
        
Show more…
7:08 PM M
11^46 .11 ...1|^31.3
87
Edit
Easily add text in PDF
Add
It so happens that every solution to the (time-dependent) Schrödinger equation can be written in this form-it is simply a matter of finding the right constants (c1, c2, …) so as to fit the initial conditions for the problem at hand. You'll see in the following sections how all this works out in practice, and in Chapter 3 we'll put it into more elegant language, but the main point is this: Once you've solved the time-independent
^5 linear combination of the functions f1(z), f2(z), … is an expression of the form

    f(z)=c1 f1(z)+c2 f2(z)+⋯

where c1, c2, … are any (complex) constants.
hap. 2 The Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation
Schrödinger equation, you're essentially done; getting from there to the general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is simple and straightforward.
*Problem 2.1 Prove the following theorems:
(a) For normalizable solutions, the separation constant E must be real. Hint: Write E (in Equation 2.6) as E0+i Γ (with E0 and Γ real), and show that if Equation 1.20 is to hold for all t, Γ must be zero.
(b) ψ can always be taken to be real (unlike Ψ, which is necessarily complex). Note: This doesn't mean that every solution to the timc-independent Schrödinger equation is real; what it says is that if you've got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions (with the same energy) that are. So in Equation 2.14 you might as well stick to ψ 's that are real. Hint: If ψ(x) satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given E, so too does its complex conjugate, and hence also the real linear combinations (ψ+ψ^*) and i(ψ-ψ^*).
(c) If V(x) is an even function [i.e., V(-x)=V(x) ], then ψ(x) can always be taken to be either even or odd. IIint: If ψ(x) satisfics the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a given E, so too does ψ(-x), and hence also the even and odd linear combinations ψ(x) ±ψ(-x).
*  Problem 2.2 Show that  E  must exceed the minimum value of  V(x)  for every normalizable solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation. What is the classical analog to this statement? Hint: Rewrite Equation 2.4 in the form

    (d^2ψ)/(d x^2)=(2 m)/(ħ^2)[V(x)-E] ψ

if E<Vmin, then ψ and its second derivative always have the same sign-argue that such a function cannot be normalized.
THE INFINITE SOUARE WELL

Added by Muhammad M.

Close

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Erwin Kreyszig 9th Edition
Chapter 5
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Need solution of problem 2.1 mentioned in uploaded image.. Thanks
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Danielle Fairburn Kathleen Carty
Ivan Kochetkov verified

Manik Pulyani and 92 other subject Physics 101 Mechanics educators are ready to help you.

Ask a new question

*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Key Concept
Premium Feature
Explore the core concept behind this problem.
Play button
Key Concept
Premium Feature
Explore the core concept behind this problem.
Your browser does not support the video tag.

*

Recommended Videos

-
tram-project-hypergeometric-equation-series-and-function-gausss-hypergeometric-odk-2-is-text-15-quad

TRAM PROJECT. Hypergeometric Equation, Series, and Function. Gauss's hypergeometric ODk $^{2}$ is $$\text { (15) } \quad x(1-x) y^{\prime \prime}+[c-(a+b+1) x] y^{\prime}-a b y=0$$ Here, $a, b, c$ are constants. This ODE is of the form $P_{23} y^{\prime \prime}+p_{1} y^{\prime}+p_{0} y=0,$ where $p_{32} p_{13} p_{0}$ are polynomials of degree $2,1,0,$ respectively, These polynomials are written so that the series solution takes a most practical form, namely. $$\begin{aligned} &y_{1}(x)=1+\frac{a b}{1 ! c} x+\frac{a(a+1) b(b+1)}{2 ! e(c+1)} x^{2}\\ &(16)\\ &+\frac{a(a+1)(a+2) b(b+1)(b+2)}{3 ! c(c+1)(c+2)} \times^{3}+\dots \end{aligned}$$ This series is called the hypergeometric series. Its sum $y_{1}(x)$ is called the hypergeametric function and is denoted by $F(a, b, c ; x)$. Here, $c \neq 0,-1,-2,+\infty$ By choosing specific values of $a, b, c$ we can obtain an incredibly large number of special functions as solutions of (15)$[$ sea the small sample of elementary functions in part (c)]. This accounts for the importance $o f(15).$ (a) Hypergeometric series and function. Show that the initial equation of (15) has the roots $r_{1}=0$ and $r_{\mathrm{a}}=1-\mathrm{c} .$ Show that for $r_{1}=0$ the Frobentus method gives (16). Motivate the name for (16) by showing that $$F(1, L, l ; x)=F(1, b, b, x)=F\left(a, 1, a_{i}, x\right)=\frac{1}{1-x}$$ (b) Convergence. For what $a$ or $b$ will (16) reduce to a polynomial? Show that for any other a, by e. $(c \neq 0,-1,-2,++)$ the series (16) convarges when $|x|<1$ (c) Special cases, Show that $$\begin{aligned} &(1+x)^{n}=F(-n, b, b ;-x)\\ &(1-x)^{h}=1-n x F\left(1-n_{1}, 1,2 ; x\right) \end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned} &\text { arctan } x=x \cdot \operatorname{ran} 1.2:-x^{3}\\ &\arcsin x=x F\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{5}, \frac{3}{8}, x^{2}\right) \end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned} &\ln (1+x)=x F(L, 1,2 ;-x)\\ &\ln \frac{1+x}{1-x}=2 x \cdot\left(\frac{1}{2}, 1, \frac{3}{2}, x^{2}\right) \end{aligned}$$ Find more stuch relations from the literature on special functions (d) Second solution. Show that for $r_{n}=1-c$ the Frobenius method yields the following solution (where $c \neq 2,3,4, . .$ (17) $y(x)=x^{2-\alpha}\left(1+\frac{(a-c+1)(b-c+1)}{11(-c+2)}\right.$ \[ +\frac{(a-c+1)(a-c+2)(b-c+1)(b-c+2)}{2 !(-c+2)(-c+3)} \times^{2} \] $+\cdots \cdot)$ Show that \[ y_{2}(x)=x^{1-2} F\left(a-c+1, b-x+1,2-c_{1} x\right) \] (e) On the generality of the hypergeometric equation. Show that $(18) \quad\left(t^{2}+A t+B\right) y+(C t+D) y+x y=0$ with $\dot{y}=d y d t,$ eter, constant $A_{n}, B, C, D, K,$ and $t^{2}+A t+B=\left(t-t_{1}\right)\left(t-t_{2}\right)_{4} t_{1} \neq t_{2},$ cin be reduced to the hypergeometric equation with independent variable \[ x=\frac{t-t_{1}}{t_{2}-t_{1}} \] and parameters related by $C_{1}+D=-c\left(l_{2}-r_{1}\right)$ $C=a+b+1, K=a b$. From this you see that (15) is a "normalized form" of the more generd ( 18 ) aud that varlous cases of ( 18 ) can thus be solved in terms of hypergeometric functional.

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

Series Solutions of ODEs. Special Functions

Frobenius Method

prove-the-following-three-theorems-a-for-normalizable-solutions-the-separation-constant-e-must-be-4

Prove the following three theorems: (a) For normalizable solutions, the separation constant $E$ must be real. Hint: Write $E$ (in Equation 2.7) as $E_{0}+i \Gamma$ (with $E_{0}$ and $\Gamma$ real), and show that if Equation $1.20$ is to hold for all $t, \Gamma$ must be zero. (b) The time-independent wave function $\psi(x)$ can always be taken to be real (unlike $\Psi(x, t)$, which is necessarily complex). This doesn't mean that every solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation is real; what it says is that if you've got one that is $n o t$, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions (with the same energy) that are. So you might as well stick to $\psi$ 's that are real. Hint: If $\psi(x)$ satisfies Equation $2.5$, for a given $E$, so too does its complex conjugate, and hence also the real linear combinations $\left(\psi+\psi^{*}\right)$ and $i\left(\psi-\psi^{*}\right)$. (c) If $V(x)$ is an even function (that is, $V(-x)=V(x))$ then $\psi(x)$ can always be taken to be either even or odd. Hint: If $\psi(x)$ satisfies Equation $2.5$, for a given $E$, so too does $\psi(-x)$, and hence also the even and odd linear combinations $\psi(x) \pm \psi(-x)$

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Time-independent Schrödinger Equation

Stationary States

use-the-method-of-bisection-to-find-the-positive-root-of-the-equation-5-x211-x-170-correct-to-3-sign

Use the method of bisection to find the positive root of the equation $5 x^{2}+11 x-17=0$ correct to 3 significant figures. Let $f(x)=5 x^{2}+11 x-17$ then, using functional notation: $$ \begin{aligned} The method of bisection suggests that the root is at $\frac{1+2}{2}=1.5$, i.e. the interval between 1 and 2 has been bisected. Hence $$ \begin{aligned} f(1.5) &=5(1.5)^{2}+11(1.5)-17 \\ &=+\mathbf{1 0 . 7 5} \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1)$ is negative, $f(1.5)$ is positive, and $f(2)$ is also positive, a root of the equation must lie between. $x=1$ and $x=1.5$, since a sign change has occurred between $f(1)$ and $f(1.5)$ Bisecting this interval gives $\frac{1+1.5}{2}$ i.e. $1.25$ as the next root. Hence $$ \begin{aligned} f(1.25) &=5(1.25)^{2}+11 x-17 \\ &=+4.5625 \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1)$ is negative and $f(1.25)$ is positive, a root lies between $x=1$ and $x=1.25$ Bisecting this interval gives $\frac{1+1.25}{2}$ i.e. $1.125$ Hence $$ \begin{aligned} f(1.125) &=5(1.125)^{2}+11(1.125)-17 \\ &=+1.703125 \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1)$ is negative and $f(1.125)$ is positive, a root lies between $x=1$ and $x=1.125$ Bisecting this interval gives $\frac{1+1.125}{2}$ i.e. $1.0625$ &f(0)=-17 \\ &f(1)=5(1)^{2}+11(1)-17=-1 \\ &f(2)=5(2)^{2}+11(2)-17=+25 \end{aligned} $$ Hence $$ \begin{aligned} f(1.0625) &=5(1.0625)^{2}+11(1.0625)-17 \\ &=+0.33203125 \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1)$ is negative and $f(1.0625)$ is positive, a root lies between $x=1$ and $x=1.0625$ Bisecting this interval gives $\frac{1+1.0625}{2}$ i.e. $1.03125$ Hence $$ \begin{aligned} f(1.03125) &=5(1.03125)^{2}+11(1.03125)-17 \\ &=-0.338867 \ldots \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1.03125)$ is negative and $f(1.0625)$ is positive, a root lies between $x=1.03125$ and $x=1.0625$ Bisecting this interval gives $$ \frac{1.03125+1.0625}{2} \text { i.e. } 1.046875 $$ Hence $$ \begin{aligned} \boldsymbol{f}(\mathbf{1 . 0 4 6 8 7 5}) &=5(1.046875)^{2}+11(1.046875)-17 \\ &=-\mathbf{0 . 0 0 4 6 3 8 6} \ldots \end{aligned} $$ Since $f(1.046875)$ is negative and $f(1.0625)$ is positive, a root lies between $x=1.046875$ and $x=1.0625$ Bisecting this interval gives $$ \frac{1.046875+1.0625}{2} \text { i.e. } \mathbf{1 . 0 5 4 6 8 7 5} $$ The last three values obtained for the root are $1.03125$, $1.046875$ and $1.0546875$. The last two values are both 1.05, correct to 3 significant figure. We therefore stop the iterations here. Thus, correct to 3 significant figures, the positive root of $5 x^{2}+11 x-17=0$ is $1.05$

Higher Engineering Mathematics


*

Recommended Textbooks

-
University Physics with Modern Physics

University Physics with Modern Physics

Hugh D. Young 14th Edition
achievement 1,805 solutions
Physics: Principles with Applications

Physics: Principles with Applications

Douglas C. Giancoli 7th Edition
achievement 1,093 solutions
Fundamentals of Physics

Fundamentals of Physics

David Halliday, Robert Resnick , Jearl Walker 10th Edition
achievement 1,287 solutions
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever