Question 46 2 pts If there is evidence that a word used in a contract has a particular trade usage, courts will give it that meaning. ask the contracting parties to add it to the \textit{nolo} \textit{contendere} section of the contract. replace the word with its legal equivalent. ask the contracting parties to add it as a comment to the contract. ask the contracting parties to remove that word from the contract.
Added by Mario B.
Close
Step 1
Step 1: The question asks what courts will do if there is evidence that a word used in a contract has a particular trade usage. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
James Kiss and 85 other Microeconomics educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
A contract is made between two parties. The terms of the contract are complete and unambiguous. A dispute arises between the parties. Party A wants to pull out of the contract without penalty. Party B argues that Party A's proposed action is prohibited by the express terms of the contract. Party A argues that the parties verbally agreed to ignore that provision of the contract that would impose a penalty on Party A. Which party will prevail and why?
James K.
Sanchit J.
Suppose you and I have a verbal contract for the sale of land. We have shaken hands on all the terms, but the next day I decide to change my mind and demand more money. You are outraged and want to sue me to enforce the verbal contract. What best describes your legal position?
Crystal W.
Recommended Textbooks
Principles of Economics
Principles of Microeconomics for AP® Courses
Economics
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD