00:01
Hi, so the question here asks why according to the condition suppression theory of punishment, punishment is effective in changing behavior.
00:17
We have four options.
00:18
Now first, let us recall the definition of condition suppression theory of punishment.
00:23
This theory suggests that punishment does not directly teach an animal or a person what to do.
00:29
Instead, it creates a negative emotional emotional state like fear associated with the punish behavior which suppresses that behavior now let's analyze the given options first one this choice suggests that punishment forces an animal to choose a less likely behavior over a more likely one and that's this one doesn't directly relate to the emotional response or suppression aspect of the condition condition suppression theory.
00:58
So option a is just going to write here false.
01:01
And b, this choice states that punishment triggers an emotional response that temporarily prevents the animal from performing the target behavior.
01:11
Now this aligns closely with the conditioned suppression theory, which emphasizes the role of negative emotional states in suppressing behavior.
01:24
So we can say option b is true.
01:27
C.
01:28
This choice suggests that punishment is a form of negative reinforcement for any behavior or other than the one being punished.
01:35
While negative reinforcement and punishment can sometimes produce similar outcomes, they are distinct concepts.
01:42
Negative reinforcement increases a behavior by removing an unpleasant stimulus, whereas punishment decreases a behavior by introducing an unpleasant stimulus...