00:01
So for this problem, to begin, we know that in our original equation, we have the predicted value for wage is equal to 15 minus 3 times female.
00:12
I'll just write this as 3 times f for short.
00:15
So the first thing that we need to note is that we'd have a particular predicted value for wage if f is equal to 0.
00:25
15 minus 3 times 0 would just be 15.
00:27
Now we need to consider if f is equal to zero, what does that represent? well, that represents that the individual is male.
00:37
So when we consider the regression equation done in the opposite way, where we'd have a wage or predicted wage is equal to some intercept plus some coefficient, i'll call this b0 plus b1 times m, well, we would have that that intercept value, b0, corresponds to when m is equal to 0.
00:59
Which would be the occurrence when the individual is female.
01:09
So what does that mean here? we have that they were working from the exact same data set.
01:14
So the predicted values in those situations should match.
01:19
But what we'd have to have is that the predicted value for wage, when m is equal to zero, should be the same as the predicted value for the first equation, when f is equal to 1.
01:31
So that would be 15 minus 3, which is equal to 12...