00:01
In this question we are given that suppose that we have an argument that we have an argument with only one premise.
00:19
So we have only one premise and suppose that the argument is invalid and suppose that argument is invalid.
00:41
This is given to us.
00:44
Argument is invalid.
00:47
Now we have to find out can the premise be logically equivalent to the conclusion.
00:52
Now give you a given that we have an argument with only one premise and that the argument is invalid.
00:59
Now since premise we have to find out is the premise logically equivalent to the conclusion.
01:09
So, we will say that the premise is not logically equivalent to, equivalent to conclusion.
01:25
Why so? the reason is, reason is going to be, since if it is true, that the premise is logically in my equivalent to conclusion, if it is true both premises this will imply both premises and conclusion and conclusion and conclusion have the same truth value have the same truth value and this will imply that the argument is valid but we are already given but we are already given here but we know argument is invalid.
02:22
We know argument is invalid...