00:01
In this question, you look at a study, right, experimental study, to evaluate the effectiveness of some vaccine, right? so in this study, it sampled 1 ,000 healthy children, right? five hundred of them, so 500 of these children is going to receive the new vaccine, right? new vaccine.
00:25
And 500 of them is going to receive old vaccine, right? and then these children will be followed by two years to monitor the disease.
00:35
And in our study, the risk ratio, the risk ratio, according to the question, is 0 .5 among the children with new vaccination, right? so this children vaccinated with new vaccine, you know, has a risk ratio 0 .5 compared to the the children who receive the old vaccine.
01:02
So the, and then the experiment, the end in the research of calculate the 95 % confidative interval, converse interval for this relative risk and it was found that this conflict, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, it's between 0 .2 and 0 .8.
01:24
And, and the p value, that is the p value, p value for this calculation actually is 0 .0.
01:31
0 .1, right? so you asked, you're giving a few statements regarding the, you know, the information, and you asked which one of this is actually correct.
01:42
So first statement says the children who received a new vaccine had a 50 % reduced risk or have the risk of developing patous, butus compared to this received a out vaccine.
02:01
This is not exactly, this is not exactly true, right? because what this confers in interval basically says is that the average, right, the mean a value of this risk ratio is likely to lie between these two numbers, you know, with a 95 % chance, right? so it does not really say the children who receive a new vaccine had a 15 % percent reduced risk...