00:01
Okay, so i see that you need help with this question.
00:02
A scientist is conducting an experiment using 100 adult subjects, hoping to finally discover a cure for liver cancer.
00:22
Conducting this one last study is the only way to identify the substance can cure the disease and save lives of countless people.
00:31
But the experiment causes long -lasting, long -lasting, horrible pain in the subjects and they will not be able to benefit in any way from the study's success the researcher would ordinarily never be able to enlist any subjects for the study because of these two factors so to ensure the cooperation of subjects he lies to them oh so he lies he says that being part of the study will be painless and increase lifespan the study is completed, the cure is found, and the subjects spend the next year in agony.
01:35
What would natural law theory say about the scientist's actions? so from the perspective of natural law theory, the scientists ' actions are morally wrong.
02:05
Despite the noble goal of finding a cure for liver cancer, the means by which the goal is pursued are unethical.
02:19
The violation of the subject's dignity, the deceit involved, the harm caused to the subjects outweigh the potential benefits of the research...