00:01
In this question, we are looking at a couple of goods, coke and pepsi, and skis and ski bindings.
00:10
So for the first part, in a, we want to know which of these is a substitute and which is a complement.
00:22
So kind of right off the bat, we're looking at how close these two are together.
00:30
Let's see.
00:31
Man, that's difficult to draw up.
00:35
But we got there.
00:37
So for the substitutes, really you're looking at coke and pepsi as being substitutes.
00:44
As long as, you know, they're both drinks.
00:48
They're both, you know, the kind of dark brown.
00:53
They've got very similar tastes.
00:58
And in a lot of ways, i mean, for me personally, i don't really care which of these two i'm having.
01:05
They both kind of fill the same role for me.
01:10
And apparently they do for a lot of other people because you know, you show up to a place and they've got a deal with one or the other, and it's not a huge deal to the business.
01:20
They get better perks from just having that exclusive deal.
01:25
Whereas with skis and ski bindings, these are clearly complement.
01:31
You know, if you have some ski bindings and you don't have skis, you're not going downhill.
01:37
And if you have skis and you don't have ski bindings, you might be going downhill in a way that you don't really like.
01:43
You're just going to be sitting on a piece of wood and, you know, you're bound to come off of that.
01:50
It's just not going to work.
01:52
So that's part a.
01:55
In part b, we want to look at the indifference curves of these goods.
01:59
And so if i've got an option of having skis, you know, number of skis and number of ski bindings, i'm just going to abbreviate that sb.
02:15
If i am buying compliments, then really i'm not going to get a whole lot of having a whole bunch of extra ski bindings.
02:32
You know, so, you know, without extra skis...