Does it make sense to say that one can be morally responsible even if one’s actions are completely determined?
Added by Meredith V.
Step 1
** Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Nick Johnson and 91 other Psychology educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Which of the following positions is closest to the position Holbach argues for about free will? The notion of free will is logically incoherent. We are free, but only just a little. We are not responsible. If the universe is deterministic (and it is), we do not act freely. If the universe is deterministic (and it is not), we do not act freely.
Nick J.
At this moment in history, apparently there is no scientific evidence that proves determinism to be true. Why, then, do so many philosophers seem so convinced that determinism is true?
Rabeya Z.
To what extent is people's "goodness or badness" determined by forces outside of their control? Consider to what extent people's "goodness or badness" could be determined by forces such as genetic makeup, early childhood, and economic deprivation, etc. (There are many others). Be sure you consider at least two different aspects or influences. Is Aristotle right and our parents make all the difference? Is Sartre right that we freely choose our fate (and actions)? Can they both be right?
Akash M.
Recommended Textbooks
Psychology Openstax
Myers' Psychology for AP
Psychology
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD