00:01
In this question we are asked about two different equations that describe electronic oscillators.
00:07
So we are asked to compare equation 1 and equation 2 and show that equation 2 reduces to equation 1 as the frequency approaches 0.
00:18
We're going to use a simplification for exponentials.
00:22
If you expand out an exponential in terms of polynomials, we can say that e to the x is 1 plus x plus x squared over 2 factorial.
00:32
Etc.
00:33
We can keep adding additional terms.
00:36
If x is small, then we can rewrite this as e to the x equals 1 plus x, ignoring the latter terms.
00:47
And that is because if you have an x that is small and then you square it, it becomes even smaller.
00:56
So this is only true in the case of a small x.
01:04
Now let us look down here at our equations.
01:08
Let's write out the two equations.
01:10
There's similar theme between the two.
01:14
They have many of the same components.
01:18
The difference is equation 2 contains an exponential.
01:23
This is where the exponential simplification is going to come into play.
01:30
So we can see here that equation 2 states the density of states, which is dependent on frequency and temperature, is equal to 8 pi h over c cubed, h being planks constant, c being the speed of light cubed, times frequency cubed, dv, we're looking at the change of frequencies, divided by the exponential portion minus 1.
01:57
Now let us look at equation 1.
02:00
In equation 1, we see that the density of states, also dependent on frequency and temperature, is equal to 8 pi, frequency squared, rather than a cube.
02:15
Kb, now kb is the bolt's most constant times t change and frequency, all divided by the speed of light cubed...