Question

In a survey, 32% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the answering machine or telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 250 pet owners and discovered that 65 of them spoke to their pet on the answering machine or telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the $\alpha = 0.01$ level of significance. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? $H_0: p = .32$ versus $H_1: p < .32$ (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Use technology to find the P-value. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.)

          In a survey, 32% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the answering machine or telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 250 pet owners and discovered that 65 of them spoke to their pet on the answering machine or telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the $\alpha = 0.01$ level of significance.
What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
$H_0: p = .32$ versus $H_1: p < .32$ (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Use technology to find the P-value.
P-value =  (Round to three decimal places as needed.)

$In a survey, 32% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the answering machine or telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 250 pet owners and discovered that 65 of them spoke to their pet on the answering machine or telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the $\alpha = 0.01$ level of significance. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? H0: p = .32 versus H1: p < .32 (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Use technology to find the P-value. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.)$

Added by Benjamin C.

Question

Please give Ace some feedback