00:01
Rami asad worked for a large computer security firm.
00:04
As part of his employment agreement, he'd been told about and initialed on his contract, a non -compete clause, that prevented him from starting his own firm or working for a competitor in the area of a computer security for six months following his termination of employment, for whatever reason.
00:21
Rami quit his job and started his own firm that specializes in protecting websites from automated computer programs, the same type of work that he was doing for his former employee.
00:31
His former employer has brought a suit to stop rami from operating his company for six months.
00:38
Which of the following statements is correct.
00:41
A, the non -compete clause is unenforceable because it inhibits his ability to earn a living.
00:47
B, the non -compete clause is unenforceable because it runs for too long of a time period.
00:52
C, the non -compete clause is unenforceable because non -compete clauses are void.
00:57
Or d, the non -compete clause is enforceable.
01:01
Unfortunately, since rami has already signed a non -compete clause for six months following his resignation from his previous workplace, he must stop operating his business if he does not want to be sued by them.
02:29
This is because the correct answer here is d.
02:32
The non -compete clause is enforceable...