What is the key focus of the "Don't Water the Weeds" strategy?
Added by Michelle F.
Step 1
Step 1: Understand that the "Don't Water the Weeds" strategy emphasizes focusing attention and resources on positive behaviors or productive activities rather than negative or unproductive ones. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Adi S and 71 other Physics 101 Mechanics educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
I need help to get the best points of this chapter for a presentation as well as the most important thing. Beyond Problem Solving A problem-solving orientation causes us to look backward while the world evolves forward. Systems theorist and professor of organizational change, Russell Ackoff, described most planning as riding "into the future facing the past. It's like trying to drive a train from its caboose." Focusing on problems may eliminate what we don't want, at least for a while, but there's no guarantee that it will bring about the systemic changes required to sustain the quality of life that we do want. Fertilizer, for example, is used to "solve" the problem of soils depleted by overuse and monocropping. But fertilizer often creates its own cascade of problems in natural systems, including water pollution and further depletion of soils. By shifting focus away from the need to supply nutrients to impoverished soil and onto the potential for a healthy biotic community, we open space for a radical shift. Farming could become the means for creating vibrant living systems. For example, many perennial agriculture systems are specifically designed to enable plants to do the work of improving soil fertility, while simultaneously improving habitat health, stabilizing watersheds, and sequestering carbon. Starting with "the problem" can inhibit our ability to work systemically and holistically. Focusing on a problem is inherently reductionist. It brings a single broken fragment to the foreground and fails to account for the context or system within which the problem is a symptom. For example, environmental activists in an agricultural valley at the foot of the Grand Tetons in Montana opposed a development project proposed for former farmland, objecting that it would reduce open agricultural space. The activists saw development as a problem, and naturally enough, the developer saw the activists as a problem. Focusing on a problem is inherently reductionist. It brings a single broken fragment to the foreground and fails to account for the context or system within which the problem is a symptom. Rather than react, the developer sought the deeper potential in the situation. With help from Regenesis, he discovered that the land he had chosen to develop had long ago been leveled and graded to create fields. In the process, a whole series of seasonal streams had been buried, fragmenting both the watershed and the habitat. Because the climate made farming such a marginal activity in the region, the fields had been abandoned. In other words, this "open agricultural space" that the activists were working to protect was manifesting only a fraction of its former ecological health. The developer proposed that his project would restore these streams and their riparian corridors, thereby improving habitat and hydrology, the scenic qualities of the valley, and the desirability of his project as a place to live. This was a major upgrade to his original eco-resort concept.
Adi S.
What are the strategies to improve the lives of children and adolescents
Benjamin D.
Which of the following allows farmers to address the control of weeds?
Recommended Textbooks
University Physics with Modern Physics
Physics: Principles with Applications
Fundamentals of Physics
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD