00:01
There's a lot of things that shout out at me in this problem.
00:04
The first is that our x intercepts are negative 3, negative 2, and then it also appears like it crosses the y axis at 1.
00:18
I'm going to use that in a second.
00:20
And then it also has this very, a very exaggerated behavior over here at x equals 2, that i believe x equals 2 is supposed to have a multiplicity of 3 because it goes from concave up to the left side to concave down and it doesn't just cross the x -axis like these two do that negative 3 and negative 2 each have a multiplicity of one each so how does that affect our graph or our function doesn't look like it matters how they want you to write it but i'm going to mess with this a value here in a second.
01:04
And what you would do is if those are your zeros, you write the opposite, x plus 3, x plus 2.
01:11
If it helps, you can put the multiplicity of 1 at the top.
01:15
And then x minus 2, i should say as the exponent cubed because of that multiplicity of 3.
01:22
Now, that's why i pointed out that this has a y intercept of 1 because it looks like it's the order to pair 01...