• Home
  • Textbooks
  • A First Course in Continuum Mechanics
  • Balance Laws

A First Course in Continuum Mechanics

Oscar Gonzalez, Andrew M. Stuart

Chapter 5

Balance Laws - all with Video Answers

Educators


Chapter Questions

02:12

Problem 1

Let $W_{12}(\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y})$ and $W_{21}(\boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{x})$ be scalar-valued functions of two vector variables $\boldsymbol{x}$ and $\boldsymbol{y}$, and let $\boldsymbol{r}=\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{y}$.
(a) Show $\nabla^{x}|r|=\frac{r}{|\boldsymbol{r}|}$ and $\nabla^{y}|\boldsymbol{r}|=-\frac{\boldsymbol{r}}{|\boldsymbol{r}|}$.
(b) Assuming $W_{12}(\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y})=\widehat{W}(|\boldsymbol{r}|)=W_{21}(\boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{x})$ show
$$
\nabla^{x} W_{12}=\frac{\widehat{W}^{\prime}(|r|)}{|r|} \boldsymbol{r}, \quad \nabla^{y} W_{21}=-\frac{\widehat{W}^{\prime}(|r|)}{|r|} r
$$
Here $\widehat{W}^{\prime}(s)$ denotes the derivative of $\widehat{W}(s)$.

Foster Wisusik
Foster Wisusik
Numerade Educator
02:52

Problem 2

Use the results of Exercise 1 to show that (5.1) implies the particle balance laws in $(5.3)-(5.6)$ under the stated assumptions on the interaction energies, namely
$$
U_{i j}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{i}, \boldsymbol{x}_{j}\right)=\widehat{U}_{i j}\left(\left|\boldsymbol{x}_{i}-\boldsymbol{x}_{j}\right|\right)=U_{j i}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, \boldsymbol{x}_{i}\right), \quad(\text { no sum })
$$

Salamat Ali
Salamat Ali
Numerade Educator
02:19

Problem 3

Use Axiom 5.2 and the definitions of $\boldsymbol{j}\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{\boldsymbol{z}}, \boldsymbol{l}\left[\Omega_{t}\right], \boldsymbol{\tau}\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{z}$ and $r\left[\Omega_{t}\right]$ to show that the angular momentum of a body $\Omega_{t}$ satisfies
$$
\frac{d}{d t} j\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{z}=\tau\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{z}
$$
where $z$ is any fixed point.

Narayan Hari
Narayan Hari
Numerade Educator
12:27

Problem 4

Use Axioms $5.1$ and $5.2$ to show that
$$
M \dot{\boldsymbol{x}}_{\text {com }}=l\left[\Omega_{t}\right], \quad M \ddot{x}_{\text {com }}=r\left[\Omega_{t}\right]
$$
where $M$ is the mass and $\boldsymbol{x}_{\mathrm{com}}$ is the center of mass of $\Omega_{t}$.
Remark: The second result is known as the Center of Mass Theorem. It states that the motion of the center of mass of an arbitrary body $\Omega_{t}$ is the same as that of a particle having the same mass as $\Omega_{t}$, located at the center of mass of $\Omega_{t}$ and subject to the same resultant force as $\Omega_{t}$.

Keshav Singh
Keshav Singh
Numerade Educator
05:58

Problem 5

Use the results of Exercise 4 to extend the result of Exercise 3 . In particular, show that the angular momentum of a body $\Omega_{t}$ also satisfies
$$
\frac{d}{d t} j\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{\boldsymbol{x}_{\mathrm{com}}}=\tau\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{\boldsymbol{x}_{\mathrm{cam}}}
$$
where $\boldsymbol{x}_{\text {com }}$ is the center of mass of $\Omega_{t}$.

Shoukat Ali
Shoukat Ali
Other Schools
07:12

Problem 6

Rather than being constant as asserted in Axiom 5.1, suppose the mass of an arbitrary open subset $\Omega_{t}$ of $B_{t}$ satisfies the growth law
$$
\frac{d}{d t} \operatorname{mass}\left[\Omega_{t}\right]=g\left[\Omega_{t}\right]
$$
where $g\left[\Omega_{t}\right]$ is a net growth rate of the form
$$
g\left[\Omega_{t}\right]=\int_{\Omega_{t}} \gamma(\boldsymbol{x}, t) \rho(\boldsymbol{x}, t) d V_{\boldsymbol{x}}
$$
Here $\gamma(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is a prescribed spatial growth rate per unit mass. Show that the local Eulerian form of $(5.44)$ is
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \rho+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\rho \boldsymbol{v})=\gamma \rho \quad \forall \boldsymbol{x} \in B_{t}, t \geq 0
$$

Khoobchandra Agrawal
Khoobchandra Agrawal
Numerade Educator
03:28

Problem 7

Here we generalize our basic definitions of angular momentum and torque and study the resulting form of the balance of angular momentum equation. In particular, suppose the angular
momentum (about origin) of an arbitrary open subset $\Omega_{t}$ is given by
$$
j\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{o}=\int_{\Omega_{t}} \rho \eta+\boldsymbol{x} \times \rho \boldsymbol{v} d V_{\boldsymbol{x}}
$$
where $\boldsymbol{\eta}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is an intrinsic angular momentum field per unit mass, and suppose the resultant torque (about origin) of external influences on $\Omega_{t}$ is given by
$$
\tau\left[\Omega_{t}\right]_{o}=\int_{\Omega_{t}} \rho h+\boldsymbol{x} \times \rho \boldsymbol{b} d V_{x}+\int_{\partial \Omega_{t}} \boldsymbol{m}+\boldsymbol{x} \times \boldsymbol{t} d A_{\boldsymbol{x}}
$$
where $\boldsymbol{h}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is an intrinsic body torque field per unit mass and $m(x, t)$ is an intrinsic surface torque field per unit area. Notice that the usual definitions of angular momentum and torque are recovered in the case when $\boldsymbol{\eta}, \boldsymbol{h}$ and $\boldsymbol{m}$ all vanish. In direct analogy to the relation $t=S n$ for surface traction, we assume $m=M n$ where $M(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is a second-order tensor field analogous to the Cauchy stress $\boldsymbol{S}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$.
(a) Show that the local Eulerian form of the law of angular. momentum in Axiom $5.2$ is
$$
\rho \dot{\eta}=\nabla^{x} \cdot \boldsymbol{M}+\boldsymbol{\xi}+\rho \boldsymbol{h}, \quad \forall x \in B_{t}, t \geq 0
$$
where $\boldsymbol{\xi}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)=\epsilon_{i j k} S_{k j}(\boldsymbol{x}, t) \boldsymbol{e}_{i} .$ (Hint: The linear momentum equation is unchanged.)
(b) Assuming $M$ and $\boldsymbol{h}$ are identically zero, show that $\dot{\boldsymbol{\eta}}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)=$ $\mathbf{0}$ if and only if $\boldsymbol{S}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is symmetric.

Manish Jain
Manish Jain
Numerade Educator
11:33

Problem 8

Let $\varphi: B \times[0, \infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{E}^{3}$ be a motion of a continuum body with spatial mass density field $\rho(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ and spatial velocity field $\boldsymbol{v}(\boldsymbol{x}, t) .$ Let $\psi(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ and $\phi(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ be arbitrary scalar fields and let $\boldsymbol{w}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ be an arbitrary vector field defined on $B_{t}$
(a) Show $(\ln \psi)^{\bullet}=\psi^{-1} \dot{\psi}$ and $(\psi \phi) \bullet=\dot{\psi} \phi+\psi \dot{\phi}$, where a dot denotes the total or material time derivative.
(b) Use part (a) and Result $5.5$ to show
$$
\left(\rho^{-1} \phi\right)^{\bullet}=\rho^{-1}\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \phi+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\phi \boldsymbol{v})\right]
$$
(c) Use the result in (b) to show
$$
\left(\rho^{-1} \boldsymbol{w}\right)^{\bullet}=\rho^{-1}\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \boldsymbol{w}+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\boldsymbol{w} \otimes \boldsymbol{v})\right]
$$

Carlos Pinilla
Carlos Pinilla
Numerade Educator
02:03

Problem 9

Consider a material model where the Cauchy stress tensor is given by
$$
\boldsymbol{S}(\boldsymbol{x}, t)=-p(\boldsymbol{x}, t) \boldsymbol{I}
$$
Here $p(\boldsymbol{x}, t)$ is a scalar field called pressure. Show that Results 5.5, $5.7$ and $5.10$ imply
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\rho v)=0 \\
&\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\rho \boldsymbol{v})+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\rho \boldsymbol{v} \otimes \boldsymbol{v}+p \boldsymbol{I})=\rho \boldsymbol{b} \\
&\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\rho E)+\nabla^{x} \cdot(\rho E \boldsymbol{v}+p \boldsymbol{v})=\rho r-\nabla^{x} \cdot \boldsymbol{q}+\rho \boldsymbol{b} \cdot \boldsymbol{v}
\end{aligned}
$$
where $E=\phi+\frac{1}{2}|\boldsymbol{v}|^{2}$ is the total energy density field. Notice that, once constitutive equations relating $(p, \boldsymbol{q}, \phi)$ to $(\rho, \boldsymbol{v}, \theta)$ are specified, we obtain a closed system of equations for $(\rho, \boldsymbol{v}, \theta)$

Manik Pulyani
Manik Pulyani
Numerade Educator
01:20

Problem 10

Show that the stress power $P: \dot{F}$ per unit reference volume can be written as
$$
\boldsymbol{P}: \dot{\boldsymbol{F}}=\frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}: \dot{\boldsymbol{C}}
$$
where $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}$ is the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor and $C$ is the right Cauchy strain tensor (see Chapter 4 ).

Hast Aggarwal
Hast Aggarwal
Numerade Educator
03:11

Problem 11

Derive Result $5.20$.

Narayan Hari
Narayan Hari
Numerade Educator
20:37

Problem 12

Here we study the energy balance equation in Result $5.18$ and the Clausius-Duhem inequality in Result $5.20$ for a body undergoing an arbitrary rigid motion
$$
\varphi(\boldsymbol{X}, t)=\boldsymbol{\Lambda}(t) \boldsymbol{X}+\boldsymbol{c}(t), \quad \forall \boldsymbol{X} \in B, t \geq 0
$$
where $\boldsymbol{\Lambda}(t)$ is a rotation and $\boldsymbol{c}(t)$ is a vector. Notice that $\boldsymbol{\Lambda}(t)=$ $\boldsymbol{I}$ and $\boldsymbol{c}(t)=\mathbf{0}$ for all $t \geq 0$ corresponds to the case of a body at rest in its reference configuration $B$.
(a) Use the result of Exercise 10 to show that the stress power $\boldsymbol{P}: \dot{\boldsymbol{F}}$ per unit reference volume vanishes identically for an arbitrary rigid motion.
(b) Suppose the internal energy density and heat flux fields are given by constitutive relations of the form $\Phi=\alpha \Theta$ and $Q=$
$-\kappa \nabla^{x} \Theta$, where $\alpha$ and $\kappa$ are scalar constants. Show that the energy balance equation reduces to
$$
\rho_{0} \alpha \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial t}=\kappa \Delta^{x} \Theta+\rho_{0} R, \quad \forall X \in B, t \geq 0
$$
This is a linear partial differential equation for $\Theta(\boldsymbol{X}, t)$ known as the Heat Equation.
(c) Suppose the constitutive relation for $\Phi$ is dropped and replaced by constitutive relations for the free energy $\Psi$ and entropy $\eta_{m}$ of the form
$$
\Psi=\hat{\Psi}(\Theta), \quad \eta_{m}=-\frac{d \widehat{\Psi}}{d \Theta}(\Theta)
$$
where $\hat{\Psi}$ is a given function. In this case show that the energy balance equation reduces to
$$
-\rho_{0} \Theta \frac{d^{2} \widehat{\Psi}}{d \Theta^{2}}(\Theta) \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial t}=\kappa \Delta^{x} \Theta+\rho_{0} R, \quad \forall X \in B, t \geq 0
$$
This is a nonlinear partial differential equation for $\Theta(\boldsymbol{X}, t)$.
(d) Assuming constitutive relations as in part (c), show that the Clausius-Duhem inequality in Result $5.20$ is satisfied for arbitrary rigid motions and temperature fields only if $\kappa \geq 0$. Thus a model with $\kappa<0$ would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Amit Srivastava
Amit Srivastava
Numerade Educator
05:22

Problem 13

Derive Result $5.22$.

Arpit Gupta
Arpit Gupta
Numerade Educator
00:29

Problem 14

With the aid of Result $5.22$ determine which of the following constitutive equations for the Cauchy stress field $S$ are frameindifferent. Here $\mu, \lambda$ and $\gamma$ are arbitrary constants.
(a) $\boldsymbol{S}=2 \mu \nabla^{x} \boldsymbol{v}$.
(b) $S=\mu L$.
(c) $S=\lambda \rho^{\gamma} \boldsymbol{I}$.

Lucas Finney
Lucas Finney
Numerade Educator
05:26

Problem 15

Consider a material body with spatial velocity field $\boldsymbol{v}$ and associated spin tensor field $\boldsymbol{W}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\nabla^{x} \boldsymbol{v}-\nabla^{x} \boldsymbol{v}^{T}\right) .$ Let $\boldsymbol{T}$ be an arbitrary frame-indifferent spatial tensor field on the body, so $T^{*}=Q T Q^{T}$ for any superposed rigid motion defined by $Q(t)$ Let $\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{ma}}(\boldsymbol{T})$ denote the material or total time derivative of $\boldsymbol{T}$ defined by
$$
\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{ma}}(\boldsymbol{T})=\dot{\boldsymbol{T}}
$$
and let $\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{co}}(\boldsymbol{T}, \boldsymbol{W})$ denote the co-rotational or Jaumann time
derivative of $T$ with respect to $\boldsymbol{W}$ defined by (see Chapter 2 Exercise 14)
$$
\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{co}}(\boldsymbol{T}, \boldsymbol{W})=\dot{\boldsymbol{T}}+\boldsymbol{W}^{T} \boldsymbol{T}+\boldsymbol{T} \boldsymbol{W}
$$
(a) For any superposed rigid motion defined by a rotation tensor $Q(t)$ show that
$$
\boldsymbol{W}^{*}=Q W Q^{T}+\dot{Q} Q^{T}
$$
(b) Show that $\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{co}}(\boldsymbol{T}, \boldsymbol{W})$ is frame-indifferent in the sense that
$$
J_{\mathrm{co}}\left(\boldsymbol{T}^{*}, \boldsymbol{W}^{*}\right)=\boldsymbol{Q} \boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{co}}(\boldsymbol{T}, \boldsymbol{W}) \boldsymbol{Q}^{T}
$$
whereas $\boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{ma}}(\boldsymbol{T})$ is not frame-indifferent in the sense that
$$
J_{\mathrm{ma}}\left(T^{*}\right) \neq \boldsymbol{Q} \boldsymbol{J}_{\mathrm{ma}}(\boldsymbol{T}) \boldsymbol{Q}^{T}
$$

Keshav Singh
Keshav Singh
Numerade Educator