Overlapping transition curves as evidence for a two-state transition. Consider a two-state transition $A \rightarrow B . m$ is an order parameter: when $m=0$, the sys tem is fully in state $A$; when $m=1$, the system is in state $B$. Suppose some agent $x$ (which could be the temperature or the concentration of ligands or salts) shifts the equilibrium as indicated in Figure $26.20$. An experiment measures a property $g$ (which might be fluorescence, light scattering, circular dichroism, heat, etc.):
$$
g(m)=g_{B} m+g_{A}(1-m)
$$
where $g_{B}$ and $g_{A}$ are the measured values for pure $B$ and A, respectively. A different type of experiment measures another property $h$ :
$$
h(m)=h_{g} m+h_{A}(1-m)
$$
where $h_{B}$ and $h_{A}$ are also the measured values for the pure states. Show that if the baselines of the two types of experiment are superimposed $\left(g_{A}=h_{A}\right)$ and the amplitudes are scaled to be the same $\left(h_{B}-h_{A}=g_{B}-g_{A}\right)$, then the curve $h(x)$ must superimpose on $g(x)$.
Figure $26.20$ A transition curve for folding, binding, or conformational change, in which the order parameter $m$ is a function of some agent $x$ that shifts the equilibrium.