A car manufacturer claims that the cars it sells have an average fuel efficiency of $35 \mathrm{mpg}$. A consumer group believes that the true figure is lower. The consumer group obtains a random sample of 5 of the company's cars and determines an average of $32 \mathrm{mpg}$. In response to the consumer group's findings, the company runs a simulation by randomly picking 5 cars 160 times from a fleet of cars of known $35 \mathrm{mpg}$ efficiency and calculating the resulting averages to show that 32 mpg was possible. The company makes the following dotplot. Does the company's argument seem reasonable given this dotplot?
(A) Yes, because the dotplot shows that anything is possible in the real world.
(B) Yes, because the dotplot shows that the average was not 35 for every 5 -car set that the company randomly picked..
(C) Yes, because the dotplot shows that $32 \mathrm{mpg}$ is a possible average of 5 cars from a fleet of cars of known $35 \mathrm{mpg}$ efficiency.
(D) No, because the dotplot shows that anything is possible in the real world.
(E) No, because the possibility of picking 5 cars with an average of $32 \mathrm{mpg}$ or lower from a fleet of cars of known 35 mpg efficiency is very small, only 4 out of 160 , or
$0.025 .$