• Home
  • Textbooks
  • Classical Electrodynamics
  • Introduction to Electrostatics

Classical Electrodynamics

John David Jackson

Chapter 1

Introduction to Electrostatics - all with Video Answers

Educators

AP

Chapter Questions

06:17

Problem 1

Use Gauss's theorem [and (1.21) if necessary] to prove the following:
(a) Any excess charge placed on a conductor must lie entirely on its surface. (A conductor by definition contains charges capable of moving freely under the action of applied electric fields.)
(b) A closed, hollow conductor shields its interior from fields due to charges outside, but does not shield its exterior from the fields due to charges placed inside it.
(c) The electric field at the surface of a conductor is normal to the surface and has a magnitude $\sigma / \epsilon_{0}$, where $\sigma$ is the charge density per unit area on the surface.

Linda Winkler
Linda Winkler
Numerade Educator
01:43

Problem 2

The Dirac delta function in three dimensions can be taken as the improper limit as $\alpha \rightarrow 0$ of the Gaussian function
$$
D(\alpha ; x, y, z)=(2 \pi)^{-x / 2} \alpha^{-3} \exp \left[-\frac{1}{2 a^{2}}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)\right]
$$
Consider a general orthogonal coordinate system specified by the surfaces $u=$ constant, $v=$ constant, $w=$ constant, with length elements $d u l U, d v / V, d w / W$ in the three perpendicular directions. Show that
$$
\delta\left(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)=\delta\left(u-u^{\prime}\right) \delta\left(v-v^{\prime}\right) \delta\left(w-w^{\prime}\right) \cdot U V W
$$
by considering the limit of the Gaussian above. Note that as $\alpha \rightarrow 0$ only the infinitesimal length element need be used for the distance between the points in the exponent.

Tanishq Gupta
Tanishq Gupta
Numerade Educator
03:12

Problem 3

Using Dirac delta functions in the appropriate coordinates, express the following charge distributions as three-dimensional charge densities $\rho(\mathbf{x})$.
(a) In spherical coordinates, a charge $Q$ uniformly distributed over a spherical shell of radius $R$.
(b) In cylindrical coordinates, a charge $\lambda$ per unit length uniformly distributed over a cylindrical surface of radius $b$.
(c) In cylindrical coordinates, a charge $Q$ spread uniformly over a flat circular disc of negligible thickness and radius $R$.
(d) The same as part (c), but using spherical coordinates.

Supratim Pal
Supratim Pal
Numerade Educator
02:38

Problem 4

Each of three charged spheres of radius $a$, one conducting, one having a uniform charge density within its volume, and one having a spherically symmetric charge density that varies radially as $r^{\prime \prime}(n>-3)$, has a total charge $Q$. Use Gauss's theorem to obtain the electric fields both inside and outside each sphere. Sketch the behavior of the fields as a function of radius for the first two spheres, and for the third with $n=-2,+2$

David Zhang
David Zhang
Numerade Educator
01:08

Problem 5

The time-averaged potential of a neutral hydrogen atom is given by
$$
\Phi=\frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{e^{-a r}}{r}\left(1+\frac{\alpha r}{2}\right)
$$
where $q$ is the magnitude of the electronic charge, and $\alpha^{-1}=a_{0} / 2, a_{0}$ being the Bohr radius. Find the distribution of charge (both continuous and discrete) that will give this potential and interpret your result physically.

Adriano Chikande
Adriano Chikande
Numerade Educator
06:16

Problem 6

A simple capacitor is a device formed by two insulated conductors adjacent to each other. If equal and opposite charges are placed on the conductors, there will be a certain difference of potential between them. The ratio of the magnitude of the charge on one conductor to the magnitude of the potential difference is called the capacitance (in SI units it is measured in farads). Using Gauss's law, calculate the capacitance of
(a) two large, flat, conducting sheets of area $A$, separated by a small distance $d$;
(b) two concentric conducting spheres with radii $a, b(b>a)$;
(c) two concentric conducting cylinders of length $L$, large compared to their radii $a, b(b>a) .$
(d) What is the inner diameter of the outer conductor in an air-filled coaxial cable whose center conductor is a cylindrical wire of diameter $1 \mathrm{~mm}$ and whose capacitance is $3 \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{~F} / \mathrm{m} ? 3 \times 10^{-12} \mathrm{~F} / \mathrm{m}$ ?

Kai Chen
Kai Chen
Princeton University
02:54

Problem 7

Two long, cylindrical conductors of radii $a_{1}$ and $a_{2}$ are parallel and separated by a distance $d$, which is large compared with either radius. Show that the capacitance per unit length is given approximately by
$$
C=\pi \epsilon_{0}\left(\ln \frac{d}{a}\right)^{-1}
$$
where $a$ is the geometrical mean of the two radii. Approximately what gauge wire (state diameter in millimeters) would be necessary to make a two-wire transmission line with a capacitance of $1.2 \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{~F} / \mathrm{m}$ if the separation of the wires was $0.5 \mathrm{~cm} ? 1.5 \mathrm{~cm} ? 5.0 \mathrm{~cm} ?$

Mayukh Banik
Mayukh Banik
Numerade Educator
07:32

Problem 8

(a) For the three capacitor geometries in Problem $1.6$ calculate the total electrostatic energy and express it alternatively in terms of the equal and opposite charges $Q$ and $-Q$ placed on the conductors and the potential difference between them.
(b) Sketch the energy density of the electrostatic field in each case as a function of the appropriate linear coordinate.

Narayan Hari
Narayan Hari
Numerade Educator
06:01

Problem 9

Calculate the attractive force between conductors in the parallel plate capacitor (Problem 1.6a) and the parallel cylinder capacitor (Problem 1.7) for
(a) fixed charges on each conductor;
(b) fixed potential difference between conductors.

Katie Mcalpine
Katie Mcalpine
Numerade Educator
03:10

Problem 10

Prove the mean value theorem: For charge-free space the value of the electrostatic potential at any point is equal to the average of the potential over the surface of any sphere centered on that point.

Eduard Sanchez
Eduard Sanchez
Numerade Educator
02:28

Problem 11

Use Gauss's theorem to prove that at the surface of a curved charged conductor, the normal derivative of the electric field is given by
$$
\frac{1}{E} \frac{\partial E}{\partial n}=-\left(\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}\right)
$$
where $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ are the principal radii of curvature of the surface.

Eduard Sanchez
Eduard Sanchez
Numerade Educator
03:02

Problem 12

Prove Green's reciprocation theorem: If $\Phi$ is the potential due to a volume-charge density $\rho$ within a volume $V$ and a surface-charge density $\sigma$ on the conducting surface $\$$ bounding the volume $V$, while $\Phi^{\prime}$ is the potential due to another charge distribution $\rho^{\prime}$ and $\sigma^{\prime}$, then
$$
\int_{V} \rho \Phi^{\prime} d^{3} x+\int_{S} \sigma \Phi^{\prime} d a=\int_{V} \rho^{\prime} \Phi d^{3} x+\int_{s} \sigma^{\prime} \Phi d a
$$

Nick Johnson
Nick Johnson
Numerade Educator
01:29

Problem 13

Two infinite grounded parallel conducting planes are separated by a distance $d$. A point charge $q$ is placed between the planes. Use the reciprocation theorem of Green to prove that the total induced charge on one of the planes is equal to $(-q)$ times the fractional perpendicular distance of the point charge from the other plane. (Hint: As your comparison electrostatic problem with the same surfaces choose one whose charge densities and potential are known and simple.)

James Kiss
James Kiss
Numerade Educator
00:59

Problem 14

Consider the electrostatic Green functions of Section $1.10$ for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions on the surface $S$ bounding the volume $V$. Apply Green's theorem (1.35) with integration variable $\mathbf{y}$ and $\phi=G(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}), \psi=G\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}, \mathbf{y}\right)$. with $\nabla^{2}$ y $G(z, y)=-4 \pi \delta(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{z})$. Find an expression for the difference $\left[G\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)-\right.$ $\left.G\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}, \mathbf{x}\right)\right]$ in terms of an integral over the boundary surface $S$.
(a) For Dirichlet boundary conditions on the potential and the associated boundary condition on the Green function, show that $G_{D}\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right.$ must be symmetric $\operatorname{in} \mathbf{x}$ and $\mathbf{x}^{\prime}$.
(b) For Neumann boundary conditions, use the boundary condition (1.45) for $G_{N}\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)$ to show that $G_{N}\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)$ is not symmetric in general, but that $G_{N}(\mathbf{x},$,
$\mathbf{x}^{\prime}$ ) $-F(\mathbf{x})$ is symmetric in $\mathbf{x}$ and $\mathbf{x}^{\prime}$, where
$$
F(\mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{S} \oint_{S} G_{N}(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) d a_{y}
$$
(c) Show that the addition of $F(\mathbf{x})$ to the Green function does not affect the potential $\Phi(\mathbf{x})$. See problem $3.26$ for an example of the Neumann Green function.

Raj Bala
Raj Bala
Numerade Educator
02:28

Problem 15

Prove Thomson's theorem: If a number of surfaces are fixed in position and a given total charge is placed on each surface, then the electrostatic energy in the region bounded by the surfaces is an absolute minimum when the charges are placed so that every surface is an equipotential, as happens when they are conductors.

Eduard Sanchez
Eduard Sanchez
Numerade Educator
00:46

Problem 16

If a number of conducting surfaces are fixed in position with a given total charge on each, the introduction of an uncharged, insulated conductor into the region bounded by the surfaces lowers the electrostatic energy.

Luis Rios
Luis Rios
Numerade Educator
08:05

Problem 17

A volume $V$ in vacuum is bounded by a surface $S$ consisting of several separate conducting surfaces $S_{i}$. One conductor is held at unit potential and all the other conductors at zero potential.
(a) Show that the capacitance of the one conductor is given by
$$
C=\epsilon_{0} \int_{V}|\nabla \Phi|^{2} d^{\top} x
$$
where $\Phi(\mathbf{x})$ is the solution for the potential.
(b) Show that the true capacitance $C$ is always less than or equal to the quantity
$$
C[\Psi]=\epsilon_{0} \int_{V}|\nabla \Psi|^{2} d^{3} x
$$
where $\Psi$ is any trial function satisfying the boundary conditions on the conductors. This is a variational principle for the capacitance that yields an upper bound.

Sarah Mccrumb
Sarah Mccrumb
Numerade Educator
View

Problem 18

Consider the configuration of conductors of Problem 1.17, with all conductors except $S_{1}$ held at zero potential.
(a) Show that the potential $\Phi(\mathbf{x})$ anywhere in the volume $V$ and on any of the surfaces $S_{i}$ can be written
$$
\Phi(\mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \oint_{S_{1}} \sigma_{i}\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right) G\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right) d a^{\prime}
$$
where $\sigma_{1}\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)$ is the surface charge density on $S_{1}$ and $G\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)$ is the Green function potential for a point charge in the presence of all the surfaces that are held at zero potential (but with $S_{1}$ absent). Show also that the electrostatic cnergy is
$$
W=\frac{1}{8 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \oint_{S_{1}} d a \oint_{S_{1}} d a^{\prime} \sigma_{i}(\mathbf{x}) G\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right) \sigma_{1}\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)
$$
where the integrals are only over the surface $S_{1-}$
(b) Show that the variational expression
$$
C^{-1}[\sigma]=\frac{\oint_{S_{1}} d a \oint_{S_{1}} d a^{\prime} \sigma(\mathbf{x}) G\left(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right) \sigma\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}\right)}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}\left[\oint_{s_{1}} \sigma(\mathbf{x}) d a\right]^{2}}
$$
with an arbitrary integrable function $\sigma(\mathbf{x})$ defined on $S_{1}$, is stationary for small variations of $\sigma$ away from $\sigma_{1}$. Use Thomson's theorem to prove that the reciprocal of $C^{-1}[\sigma]$ gives a lower bound to the true capacitance of the conductor $S_{1}$.

AP
Andreas Papavassiliou
Numerade Educator
06:01

Problem 19

For the cylindrical capacitor of Problem $1.6 \mathrm{c}$, evaluate the variational upper bound of Problem $1.17 \mathrm{~b}$ with the naive trial function, $\Psi_{1}(\rho)=(b-\rho) /(b-a)$. Compare the variational result with the exact result for $b / a=1.5,2,3 .$ Explain the trend of your results in terms of the functional form of $\Psi_{3} .$ An improved trial function is treated by Collin (pp. $275-277$ ).

Keshav Singh
Keshav Singh
Numerade Educator
04:28

Problem 20

In estimating the capacitance of a given configuration of conductors, comparison with known capacitances is often helpful. Consider two configurations of $n$ conductors in which the $(n-1)$ conductors held at zero potential are the same, but the one conductor whose capacitance we wish to know is different. In particular, let the conductor in one configuration have a closed surface $S_{1}$ and in the other configuration have surface $S_{1}^{\prime}$, with $S_{1}^{\prime}$ totally inside $S_{1}$.
(a) Use the extremum principle of Section $1.12$ and the variational principle of Problem $1.17$ to prove that the capacitance $C^{\prime}$ of the conductor with surface $S_{1}^{\prime}$ is less than or equal to the capacitance $C$ of the conductor with surface $S_{1}$ that encloses $S_{i}^{\prime}$
(b) Set upper and lower limits for the capacitance of a conducting cube of side $a$. Compare your limits and also their average with the numerical value, $C=0.655\left(4 \pi \epsilon_{0} a\right)$
(c) By how much do you estimate the capacitance per unit length of the two-wire system of Problem $1.7$ will change (larger? smaller?) if one of the wires is replaced by a wire of square cross section whose side is equal to its diameter?

Kai Chen
Kai Chen
Princeton University
04:10

Problem 21

A two-dimensional potential problem consists of a unit square area $(0 \leq x \leq 1,$, $0 \leq y \leq 1)$ bounded by "surfaces" held at zero potential. Over the entire square there is a uniform charge density of unit strength (per unit length in z).
(a) Apply the variational principle (1.63) for the Poisson equation with the "variational" trial function $\Psi(x, y)=A \cdot x(1-x) \cdot y(1-y)$ to determine the best value of the constant $A$. [I use quotation marks around variational because there are no parameters to vary except the overall scale.]
(b) The exact (albeit series) solution for this problem is [see Problems $2.15$ and 2.16]
$$
4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \Phi(x, y)=\frac{16}{\pi^{2}} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin [(2 m+1) \pi x]}{(2 m+1)^{3}}\left\{1-\frac{\cosh \left[(2 m+1) \pi\left(y-\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]}{\cosh [(2 m+1) \pi / 2]}\right\}
$$
For $y=0.25$ and $y=0.5$, plot and compare the simple variational solution of part a with the exact solution as functions of $x$.

Khoobchandra Agrawal
Khoobchandra Agrawal
Numerade Educator
22:57

Problem 22

Two-dimensional relaxation calculations commonly use sites on a square Iattice with spacing $\Delta x=\Delta y=h$, and label the sites by $(i, j)$, where $i, j$ are integers and $x_{i}=$ $i h+x_{0}, y_{j}=j h+y_{0} .$ The value of the potential at $(i, j)$ can be approximated by the average of the values at neighboring sites. [Recall the relevant theorem about harmonic functions.] But what average?
(a) If $F(x, y)$ is a well-behaved function in the neighborhood of the origin, but not necessarily harmonic, by explicit Taylor series expansions, show that the "cross"' sum
$$
S_{e}=F(h, 0)+F(0, h)+F(-h, 0)+F(0,-h)
$$
can be expressed as
$$
S_{c}=4 F(0,0)+h^{2} \nabla^{2} F+\frac{h^{4}}{12}\left(F_{x x x}+F_{m q y}\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right)
$$
(b) Similarly, show that the "square" sum,
$$
S_{\mathrm{S}}=F(h, h)+F(-h, h)+F(-h,-h)+F(h,-h)
$$
can be expressed as
$$
S_{\mathrm{S}}=4 F(0,0)+2 h^{2} \nabla^{2} F-\frac{h^{4}}{3}\left(F_{x x x}+F_{y y y y}\right)+\frac{h^{4}}{2} \nabla^{2}\left(\nabla^{2} F\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right)
$$
Here $F_{\text {mexr }}$ is the fourth partial derivative of $F$ with respect to $x$, evaluated at $x=0, y=0$, etc. If $\nabla^{2} F=0$, the averages $S_{d} / 4$ and $S_{3} / 4$ each give the value of $F(0,0)$, correct to order $h^{2}$ inclusive. Note that an improvement can be obtained by forming the "improved" average,
$$
\langle\langle F(0,0)\rangle\rangle=\frac{1}{5}\left[S_{e}+\frac{1}{4} S_{4}\right]
$$
where
$$
\langle(F(0,0))\rangle=F(0,0)+\frac{3}{10} h^{2} \nabla^{2} F+\frac{h^{4}}{40} \nabla^{2}\left(\nabla^{2} F\right)+O\left(h^{6}\right)
$$
If $\nabla^{2} F=0$, then $S$ gives $F(0,0)$, correct to order $h^{5}$ inclusive. For Poisson's equation, the charge density and its lowest order Laplacian can be inserted for the same accuracy.

Robert Schnibbe
Robert Schnibbe
Numerade Educator
01:26

Problem 23

A transmission line consists of a long straight conductor with a hollow square region in its interior, with a square conductor of one-quarter the area of the hollow region centered in the empty space, with edges parallel to the inner sides of outer conductor. If the conductors are raised to different potentials, the potential and electric field in the space between them exhibit an cightfold symmetry; the basic unit is sketched in the accompanying figure. The efficacy of the relaxation method in determining the properties of the transmission line can be illustrated by a simple calculation.
(a) Using only the four interior points indicated in the figure, write down the relaxation cquation for each point for the "cross"' and the "improved" averaging schemes (defined in Problem $1.22$ ) if the inner conductor has $\Phi=100$ $V$ and the outer has $\Phi=0 .$ By performing cither the relaxation iteration process or solving the set of algebraic equations for each scheme, find estimates for the potential at each of the four points for the two schemes.
(b) From the results of part a make the best estimate (or estimates) you can for the capacitance per unit length of the transmission line.
(c) (Optional) Using your favorite computational tools, repeat the relaxation calculation with half the lattice spacing ( 21 interior points) and compare.

Dominador Tan
Dominador Tan
Numerade Educator
01:16

Problem 24

Consider solution of the two-dimensional Poisson cquation problem of Problem 1.21, a unit square with zero potential on the boundary and a constant unit charge density in the interior, by the technique of relaxation. Choose $h=0.25$ so that there are nine interior sites. Use symmetry to reduce the number of needed sites to three, at $(0.25,0.25),(0.5,0.25)$, and $(0.5,0.5) .$ With so few sites, it is easy to do the iterations with a block of paper and a pocket calculator, but suit yourself.
(a) Use the "improved grid" averaging of Problem $1.22$ and the simple (Jacobian) iteration scheme, starting with $4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \Phi=1.0$ at all three interior sites. Do at least six iterations, preferably eight or ten.
(b) Repeat the iteration procedure with the same starting values, but using GaussSeidel iteration.
(c) Graph the two sets of results of each iteration versus iteration number and compare with the exact values, $4 \pi e_{0} \Phi(0.25,0.25)=0.5691,4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \Phi(0.5,0.25)$
$=0.7205,4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \Phi(0.5,0.5)=0.9258$. Comment on rate of convergence and final accuracy.

Manik Pulyani
Manik Pulyani
Numerade Educator