a. Use the Young's modulus-Relative cost $\left(E-C_{\eta, R}\right)$ chart (Fig. 3.26) to find the cheapest materials with a modulus, $E$, greater than $100 \mathrm{GPa}$.
b. Use the Strength-Relative cost $\left(\sigma_{f}-C_{R}\right)$ chart (Fig. 3.27) to find the cheapest materials with a strength, $\sigma_{f}$, above $100 \mathrm{MPa}$.
'A set of the charts can be downloaded from www.grantadesign.com. All the charts shown in this chapter were created using Granta Design's CES EduPack Materials Selection software. With it you can make charts with any pair (or combination) of properties as axes.
${ }^{2}$ Most material properties are best viewed on log scales because the ranges are so large. Instead of incrementing by steps of $1, \log$ scales increment by steps of a factor of 10 .
${ }^{3}$ Very low density foams and gels (which can be thought of as molecular-scale, fluid-filled, foams) can have lower moduli than this. As an example, gelatin (as in Jello) has a modulus of about $10^{-5} \mathrm{GPa}$. Their strengths and fracture toughness, too, can be below the lower limit of the charts.
${ }^{4}$ This can be understood by noting that a solid containing $N$ atoms has $3 N$ vibrational modes. Each (in the classical approximation) absorbs thermal energy $k T$ at the absolute temperature $T$, and the vibrational specific heat is $C_{\mathrm{p}} \approx C_{\mathrm{v}}=3 N k(\mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{K})$ where $k$ is Boltzmann's constant $\left(1.34 \times 10^{-23} \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{K}\right)$. The volume per atom, $\Omega$, for almost all solids lies within a factor of two of $1.4 \times 10^{-29} \mathrm{~m}^{3}$; thus the volume of $N$ atoms is $\left(N C_{\mathrm{p}}\right)$ $\mathrm{m}^{3}$. The volume specific heat is then (as the chart shows):