Unbeknownst to his class, an instructor decides to replicate a classic study on experimenter expectancy effects (Rosenthal & Fode, 1963). In an experimental psychology lab, each student was given a rat to teach to run a standard maze. However, half of the students were told their rats were specially bred to be "maze bright" while the remaining students were told their rats were "maze dull." In actuality, of course, all the rats were of the same breed and possessed no special talents. The following data represent the rats' skill-level at running the mazes, where lower numbers represent fewer errors (i.e., higher skill). Did the students with the maze bright rats transmit that expectancy to the animals, so that they outperformed the "maze dull" animals? Use a one-tailed test with a significance level of .05 .
Maze bright scores: $15,10,11,10,12,13,10,13,12,11$
Maze dull scores: $17,18,17,16.5,17,19,13,12,18,17$