Assume that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. Contrast the two with respect to $(a)$ price, $(b)$ output, $(c)$ profits, $(d)$ allocation of resources, and $(e)$ impact on the distribution of income. since both monopolists and competitive firms follow the $M C=M R$ rule in maximizing profits, how do you account for the different results? Why might the costs of a purely competitive firm and those of a monopolist be different? What are the implications of such a cost difference?