Consider the spin-precession problem discussed in the text. It can also be solved in the Heisenberg picture. Using the Hamiltonian

\[

H=-\left(\frac{e B}{m c}\right) S_{z}=\omega S_{z}

\]

write the Heisenberg equations of motion for the time-dependent operators $S_{x}(t)$ $S_{y}(t),$ and $S_{z}(t) .$ Solve them to obtain $S_{x, y, z}$ as functions of time.

Check back soon!

Look again at the Hamiltonian of Chapter $1,$ Problem $1.11 .$ Suppose the typist made an error and wrote $H$ as

\[

H=H_{11}|1\rangle\left\langle 1\left|+H_{22}\right| 2\right\rangle\left\langle 2\left|+H_{12}\right| 1\right\rangle\langle 2|

\]

What principle is now violated? Illustrate your point explicitly by attempting to solve the most general time-dependent problem using an illegal Hamiltonian of this kind. (You may assume $H_{11}=H_{22}=0$ for simplicity.)

Check back soon!

An electron is subject to a uniform, time-independent magnetic field of strength $B$ in the positive $z$ -direction. At $t=0$ the electron is known to be in an eigenstate of S $\cdot \hat{n}$ with eigenvalue $\hbar / 2,$ where $\hat{n}$ is a unit vector, lying in the $x z$ -plane, that makes an angle $\beta$ with the $z$ -axis.

(a) Obtain the probability for finding the electron in the $s_{x}=\hbar / 2$ state as a function of time.

(b) Find the expectation value of $S_{x}$ as a function of time.

(c) For your own peace of mind, show that your answers make good sense in the extreme cases

(i) $\beta \rightarrow 0$ and (ii) $\beta \rightarrow \pi / 2$

Check back soon!

Derive the neutrino oscillation probability $(2.1 .65)$ and use it, along with the data in Figure $2.2,$ to estimate the values of $\Delta m^{2} c^{4}$ (in units of $\mathrm{eV}^{2}$ ) and $\theta$

Check back soon!

Let $x(t)$ be the coordinate operator for a free particle in one dimension in the Heisenberg picture. Evaluate

\[

[x(t), x(0)]

\]

Check back soon!

Consider a particle in one dimension whose Hamiltonian is given by

\[

H=\frac{p^{2}}{2 m}+V(x)

\]

By calculating $[[H, x], x],$ prove

\[

\sum_{a^{\prime}}\left|\left\langle a^{\prime \prime}|x| a^{\prime}\right\rangle\right|^{2}\left(E_{a^{\prime}}-E_{a^{\prime \prime}}\right)=\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m}

\]

where $\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle$ is an energy eigenket with eigenvalue $E_{a^{\prime}}$

Check back soon!

Consider a particle in three dimensions whose Hamiltonian is given by

\[

H=\frac{\mathbf{p}^{2}}{2 m}+V(\mathbf{x})

\]

By calculating $[\mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{p}, H],$ obtain

\[

\frac{d}{d t}\langle\mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{p}\rangle=\left\langle\frac{\mathbf{p}^{2}}{m}\right\rangle-\langle\mathbf{x} \cdot \nabla V\rangle

\]

In order for us to identify the preceding relation with the quantum-mechanical analogue of the virial theorem, it is essential that the left-hand side vanish. Under what condition would this happen?

Check back soon!

Consider a free-particle wave packet in one dimension. At $t=0$ it satisfies the minimum uncertainty relation

\[

\left\langle(\Delta x)^{2}\right\rangle\left\langle(\Delta p)^{2}\right\rangle=\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4} \quad(t=0)

\]

In addition, we know

\[

\langle x\rangle=\langle p\rangle=0 \quad(t=0)

\]

Using the Heisenberg picture, obtain $\left\langle(\Delta x)^{2}\right\rangle_{t}$ as a function of $t(t \geq 0)$ when

$\left\langle(\Delta x)^{2}\right\rangle_{t=0}$ is given. (Hint: Take advantage of the property of the minimum uncertainty wave packet you worked out in Chapter $1,$ Problem $1.18 .$ )

Check back soon!

Let $\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle$ and $\left|a^{\prime \prime}\right\rangle$ be eigenstates of a Hermitian operator $A$ with eigenvalues $a^{\prime}$ and $a^{\prime \prime},$ respectively $\left(a^{\prime} \neq a^{\prime \prime}\right) .$ The Hamiltonian operator is given by

\[

H=\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle \delta\left\langle a^{\prime \prime}|+| a^{\prime \prime}\right\rangle \delta\left\langle a^{\prime}\right|

\]

where $\delta$ is just a real number.

(a) Clearly, $\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle$ and $\left|a^{\prime \prime}\right\rangle$ are not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. Write down the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. What are their energy eigenvalues?

(b) Suppose the system is known to be in state $\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle$ at $t=0 .$ Write down the state vector in the Schrödinger picture for $t>0$

(c) What is the probability for finding the system in $\left|a^{\prime \prime}\right\rangle$ for $t>0$ if the system is known to be in state $\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle$ at $t=0 ?$

(d) Can you think of a physical situation corresponding to this problem?

Check back soon!

A box containing a particle is divided into a right and a left compartment by a thin partition. If the particle is known to be on the right (left) side with certainty, the state is represented by the position eigenket $|R\rangle(|L\rangle),$ where we have neglected spatial variations within each half of the box. The most general state vector can then be written as

\[

|\alpha\rangle=|R\rangle\langle R | \alpha\rangle+|L\rangle\langle L | \alpha\rangle

\]

where $\langle R | \alpha\rangle$ and $\langle L | \alpha\rangle$ can be regarded as "wave functions." The particle can tunnel through the partition; this tunneling effect is characterized by the Hamiltonian

\[

H=\Delta(|L\rangle\langle R|+| R\rangle\langle L|)

\]

where $\Delta$ is a real number with the dimension of energy.

(a) Find the normalized energy eigenkets. What are the corresponding energy eigenvalues?

(b) In the Schrödinger picture the base kets $|R\rangle$ and $|L\rangle$ are fixed, and the state vector moves with time. Suppose the system is represented by $|\alpha\rangle$ as given above at $t=0 .$ Find the state vector $\left|\alpha, t_{0}=0 ; t\right\rangle$ for $t>0$ by applying the appropriate time-evolution operator to $|\alpha\rangle$

(c) Suppose that at $t=0$ the particle is on the right side with certainty. What is the probability for observing the particle on the left side as a function of time?

(d) Write down the coupled Schrödinger equations for the wave functions $\langle R| \alpha, t_{0}=$ $0 ; t\rangle$ and $\left\langle L | \alpha, t_{0}=0 ; t\right\rangle .$ Show that the solutions to the coupled Schrödinger equations are just what you expect from (b).

(e) Suppose the printer made an error and wrote $H$ as

\[

H=\Delta|L\rangle\langle R|

\]

By explicitly solving the most general time-evolution problem with this Hamiltonian, show that probability conservation is violated.

Check back soon!

Using the one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator as an example, illustrate the difference between the Heisenberg picture and the Schrödinger picture. Discuss in particular how (a) the dynamic variables $x$ and $p$ and (b) the most general state vector evolve with time in each of the two pictures.

Check back soon!

Consider a particle subject to a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator potential. Suppose that at $t=0$ the state vector is given by

\[

\exp \left(\frac{-i p a}{\hbar}\right)|0\rangle

\]

where $p$ is the momentum operator and $a$ is some number with dimension of length. Using the Heisenberg picture, evaluate the expectation value $\langle x\rangle$ for $t \geq 0$

Check back soon!

(a) Write down the wave function (in coordinate space) for the state specified in Problem 2.12 at $t=0 .$ You may use

\[

\left\langle x^{\prime} | 0\right\rangle=\pi^{-1 / 4} x_{0}^{-1 / 2} \exp \left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{x^{\prime}}{x_{0}}\right)^{2}\right], \quad\left(x_{0} \equiv\left(\frac{\hbar}{m \omega}\right)^{1 / 2}\right)

\]

(b) Obtain a simple expression for the probability that the state is found in the ground state at $t=0 .$ Does this probability change for $t>0 ?$

Check back soon!

Consider a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator.

(a) Using

\[

\left.\left.\begin{array}{l}

a \\

a^{\dagger}

\end{array}\right\}=\sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar}}\left(x \pm \frac{i p}{m \omega}\right), \quad \begin{array}{c}

a|n\rangle \\

a^{\dagger}|n\rangle

\end{array}\right\}=\left\{\begin{array}{l}

\sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle \\

\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle

\end{array}\right.

\]

evaluate $\langle m|x| n\rangle,\langle m|p| n\rangle,\langle m|\{x, p\}| n\rangle,\left\langle m\left|x^{2}\right| n\right\rangle,$ and $\left\langle m\left|p^{2}\right| n\right\rangle$

(b) Check that the virial theorem holds for the expectation values of the kinetic energy and the potential energy taken with respect to an energy eigenstate.

Check back soon!

(a) Using

\[

\left\langle x^{\prime} | p^{\prime}\right\rangle=(2 \pi \hbar)^{-1 / 2} e^{i p^{\prime} x^{\prime} / \hbar} \quad \text { (one dimension) }

\]

prove

\[

\left\langle p^{\prime}|x| \alpha\right\rangle=i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p^{\prime}}\left\langle p^{\prime} | \alpha\right\rangle

\]

(b) Consider a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator. Starting with the Schrödinger equation for the state vector, derive the Schrödinger equation for the momentum-space wave function. (Make sure to distinguish the operator $p$ from the eigenvalue $p^{\prime} .$ ) Can you guess the energy eigenfunctions in momentum space?

Check back soon!

Consider a function, known as the correlation function, defined by

\[

C(t)=\langle x(t) x(0)\rangle

\]

where $x(t)$ is the position operator in the Heisenberg picture. Evaluate the correlation function explicitly for the ground state of a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator.

Check back soon!

Consider again a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator. Do the following algebraically-that is, without using wave functions.

(a) Construct a linear combination of |0\rangle and |1\rangle such that $\langle x\rangle$ is as large as possible.

(b) Suppose the oscillator is in the state constructed in (a) at $t=0 .$ What is the state vector for $t>0$ in the Schrödinger picture? Evaluate the expectation value $\langle x\rangle$ as a function of time for $t>0,$ using (i) the Schrödinger picture and (ii) the Heisenberg picture.

(c) Evaluate $\left\langle(\Delta x)^{2}\right\rangle$ as a function of time using either picture.

Check back soon!

Show that for the one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator,

\[

\left\langle 0\left|e^{i k x}\right| 0\right\rangle=\exp \left[-k^{2}\left\langle 0\left|x^{2}\right| 0\right\rangle / 2\right]

\]

where $x$ is the position operator.

Check back soon!

A coherent state of a one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator is defined to be an eigenstate of the (non-Hermitian) annihilation operator $a:$

\[

a|\lambda\rangle=\lambda|\lambda\rangle

\]

where $\lambda$ is, in general, a complex number.

(a) Prove that

\[

|\lambda\rangle=e^{-|\lambda|^{2} / 2} e^{\lambda a^{\dagger}}|0\rangle

\]

is a normalized coherent state.

(b) Prove the minimum uncertainty relation for such a state.

(c) Write $|\lambda\rangle$ as

\[

|\lambda\rangle=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n)|n\rangle

\]

Show that the distribution of $|f(n)|^{2}$ with respect to $n$ is of the Poisson form. Find the most probable value of $n,$ and hence of $E$

(d) Show that a coherent state can also be obtained by applying the translation (finite-displacement) operator $e^{-i p l / \hbar}$ (where $p$ is the momentum operator and $l$ is the displacement distance to the ground state. (See also Gottfried 1966 $262-64$

Check back soon!

Let

\[

J_{\pm}=\hbar a_{\pm}^{\dagger} a_{\mp}, \quad J_{z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}\left(a_{+}^{\dagger} a_{+}-a_{-}^{\dagger} a_{-}\right), \quad N=a_{+}^{\dagger} a_{+}+a_{-}^{\dagger} a_{-}

\]

where $a_{\pm}$ and $a_{\pm}^{\dagger}$ are the annihilation and creation operators of two independent simple harmonic oscillators satisfying the usual simple harmonic oscillator commutation relations. Prove

\[

\left[J_{z}, J_{\pm}\right]=\pm \hbar J_{\pm}, \quad\left[\mathbf{J}^{2}, J_{z}\right]=0, \quad \mathbf{J}^{2}=\left(\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2}\right) N\left[\left(\frac{N}{2}\right)+1\right]

\]

Check back soon!

Derive the normalization constant $c_{n}$ in $(2.5 .28)$ by deriving the orthogonality relationship $(2.5 .29)$ using generating functions. Start by working out the integral

\[

I=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} g(x, t) g(x, s) e^{-x^{2}} d x

\]

and then consider the integral again with the generating functions in terms of series with Hermite polynomials.

Check back soon!

Consider a particle of mass $m$ subject to a one-dimensional potential of the following form:

\[

V=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}

\frac{1}{2} k x^{2} & \text { for } x>0 \\

\infty & \text { for } x<0

\end{array}\right.

\]

(a) What is the ground-state energy?

(b) What is the expectation value $\left\langle x^{2}\right\rangle$ for the ground state?

Check back soon!

A particle in one dimension is trapped between two rigid walls:

\[

V(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}

0, & \text { for } 0<x<L \\

\infty, & \text { for } x<0, x>L

\end{array}\right.

\]

At $t=0$ it is known to be exactly at $x=L / 2$ with certainty. What are the relative probabilities for the particle to be found in various energy eigenstates? Write down the wave function for $t \geq 0 .$ (You need not worry about absolute normalization, convergence, and other mathematical subtleties.)

Check back soon!

Consider a particle in one dimension bound to a fixed center by a $\delta$ -function potential of the form

\[

V(x)=-v_{0} \delta(x), \quad\left(v_{0} \text { real and positive }\right)

\]

Find the wave function and the binding energy of the ground state. Are there excited bound states?

Check back soon!

A particle of mass $m$ in one dimension is bound to a fixed center by an attractive $\delta$ -function potential:

\[

V(x)=-\lambda \delta(x), \quad(\lambda>0)

\]

At $t=0,$ the potential is suddenly switched off (that is, $V=0$ for $t>0$ ). Find the wave function for $t>0 .$ (Be quantitative! But you need not attempt to evaluate an integral that may appear.)

Check back soon!

A particle in one dimension $(-\infty<x<\infty)$ is subjected to a constant force derivable from

\[

V=\lambda x, \quad(\lambda>0)

\]

(a) Is the energy spectrum continuous or discrete? Write down an approximate expression for the energy eigenfunction specified by $E .$ Also sketch it crudely.

(b) Discuss briefly what changes are needed if $V$ is replaced by

\[

V=\lambda|x|

\]

Check back soon!

Derive an expression for the density of free-particle states in $t w o$ dimensions, normalized with periodic boundary conditions inside a box of side length $L .$ Your answer should be written as a function of $k(\text { or } E)$ times $d E d \phi,$ where $\phi$ is the polar angle that characterizes the momentum direction in two dimensions.

Check back soon!

Consider an electron confined to the interior of a hollow cylindrical shell whose axis coincides with the $z$ -axis. The wave function is required to vanish on the inner and outer walls, $\rho=\rho_{a}$ and $\rho_{b},$ and also at the top and bottom, $z=0$ and $L$

(a) Find the energy eigenfunctions. (Do not bother with normalization.) Show that the energy eigenvalues are given by

\[

E_{l m n}=\left(\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m_{e}}\right)\left[k_{m n}^{2}+\left(\frac{l \pi}{L}\right)^{2}\right] \quad(l=1,2,3, \dots, m=0,1,2, \dots)

\]

where $k_{m n}$ is the $n$ th root of the transcendental equation

\[

J_{m}\left(k_{m n} \rho_{b}\right) N_{m}\left(k_{m n} \rho_{a}\right)-N_{m}\left(k_{m n} \rho_{b}\right) J_{m}\left(k_{m n} \rho_{a}\right)=0

\]

(b) Repeat the same problem when there is a uniform magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B \hat{\mathbf{z}}$ for $0<\rho<\rho_{a} .$ Note that the energy eigenvalues are influenced by the magnetic field even though the electron never "touches" the magnetic field.

(c) Compare, in particular, the ground state of the $B=0$ problem with that of the $B \neq 0$ problem. Show that if we require the ground-state energy to be unchanged in the presence of $B,$ we obtain "flux quantization"

\[

\pi \rho_{a}^{2} B=\frac{2 \pi N \hbar c}{e}, \quad(N=0,\pm 1,\pm 2, \ldots)

\]

Check back soon!

Consider a particle moving in one dimension under the influence of a potential $V(x) .$ Suppose its wave function can be written as $\exp [i S(x, t) / \hbar] .$ Prove that $S(x, t)$ satisfies the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation to the extent that $\hbar$ can be regarded as small in some sense. Show how one may obtain the correct wave function for a plane wave by starting with the solution of the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation with $V(x)$ set equal to zero. Why do we get the exact wave function in this particular case?

Check back soon!

Using spherical coordinates, obtain an expression for $\mathbf{j}$ for the ground and excited states of the hydrogen atom. Show, in particular, that for $m_{l} \neq 0$ states, there is a circulating flux in the sense that $\mathbf{j}$ is in the direction of increasing or decreasing $\phi$ depending on whether $m_{l}$ is positive or negative.

Check back soon!

Derive $(2.6 .16)$ and obtain the three-dimensional generalization of $(2.6 .16).$

Check back soon!

Define the partition function as

\[

Z=\left.\int d^{3} x^{\prime} K\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime}, t ; \mathbf{x}^{\prime}, 0\right)\right|_{\beta=i t / \hbar}

\]

as in $(2.6 .20)-(2.6 .22) .$ Show that the ground-state energy is obtained by taking

\[

-\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \beta}, \quad(\beta \rightarrow \infty)

\]

Illustrate this for a particle in a one-dimensional box.

Check back soon!

The propagator in momentum space analogous to $(2.6 .26)$ is given by $\left\langle\mathbf{p}^{\prime \prime}, t | \mathbf{p}^{\prime}, t_{0}\right\rangle$ Derive an explicit expression for $\left\langle\mathbf{p}^{\prime \prime}, t | \mathbf{p}^{\prime}, t_{0}\right\rangle$ for the free-particle case.

Check back soon!

(a) Write down an expression for the classical action for a simple harmonic oscillator for a finite time interval.

(b) Construct $\left\langle x_{n}, t_{n} | x_{n-1}, t_{n-1}\right\rangle$ for a simple harmonic oscillator using Feynman's prescription for $t_{n}-t_{n-1}=\Delta t$ small. Keeping only terms up to order $(\Delta t)^{2}$ show that it is in complete agreement with the $t-t_{0} \rightarrow 0$ limit of the propagator given by $(2.6 .26)$

Check back soon!

State the Schwinger action principle (see Finkelstein $1973,$ p. 155 ). Obtain the solution for $\left\langle x_{2} t_{2} | x_{1} t_{1}\right\rangle$ by integrating the Schwinger principle and compare it with the corresponding Feynman expression for $\left\langle x_{2} t_{2} | x_{1} t_{1}\right\rangle .$ Describe the classical limits of these two expressions.

Check back soon!

Show that the wave-mechanical approach to the gravity-induced problem discussed in Section 2.7 also leads to phase-difference expression $(2.7 .17)$

Check back soon!

(a) Verify (2.7.25) and (2.7.27).

(b) Verify continuity equation $(2.7 .30)$ with $\mathbf{j}$ given by $(2.7 .31)$

Check back soon!

Consider the Hamiltonian of a spinless particle of charge $e .$ In the presence of a static magnetic field, the interaction terms can be generated by

\[

\mathbf{p}_{\text {operator }} \rightarrow \mathbf{p}_{\text {operator }}-\frac{e \mathbf{A}}{c}

\]

where $\mathbf{A}$ is the appropriate vector potential. Suppose, for simplicity, that the magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$ is uniform in the positive $z$ -direction. Prove that the above prescription indeed leads to the correct expression for the interaction of the orbital magnetic moment $(e / 2 m c) \mathbf{L}$ with the magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$. Show that there is also an extra term proportional to $B^{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right),$ and comment briefly on its physical significance.

Check back soon!

An electron moves in the presence of a uniform magnetic field in the $z$ -direction

\[

(\mathbf{B}=B \mathbf{2})

\]

(a) Evaluate

\[

\left[\Pi_{x}, \Pi_{y}\right]

\]

where

\[

\Pi_{x} \equiv p_{x}-\frac{e A_{x}}{c}, \quad \Pi_{y} \equiv p_{y}-\frac{e A_{y}}{c}

\]

(b) By comparing the Hamiltonian and the commutation relation obtained in

(a) with those of the one-dimensional oscillator problem, show how we can immediately write the energy eigenvalues as

\[

E_{k, n}=\frac{\hbar^{2} k^{2}}{2 m}+\left(\frac{|e B| \hbar}{m c}\right)\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)

\]

where $\hbar k$ is the continuous eigenvalue of the $p_{z}$ operator and $n$ is a nonnegative integer including zero.

Check back soon!

Consider the neutron interferometer.

Prove that the difference in the magnetic fields that produce two successive maxima in the counting rates is given by

\[

\Delta B=\frac{4 \pi \hbar c}{|e| g_{n} \bar{\lambda} l}

\]

where $g_{n}(=-1.91)$ is the neutron magnetic moment in units of $-e \hbar / 2 m_{n} c .$ (If you had solved this problem in $1967,$ you could have published your solution in Physical Review Letters!

Check back soon!