• Home
  • Southern New Hampshire University
  • Healthcare Administration Capstone HCM700
  • Evaluation Methodologies for Chronic Illness Self-Management Program

Evaluation Methodologies for Chronic Illness Self-Management Program

RUNNING HEADER: Milestone Six: Methodologies Evaluation Methodologies: Chronic Illness Self- Management Program Fannie L Booker HCM 700 September 26, 2019 Evaluation Methodologies 2 Introduction Before you can manage the process and performance of your program, you must a have clear vision mapped out and a strategic plan in place. The first step an organization can take to ensure there are good solid measure is to create a score card. Measurements is important to the success of any program. If you don't measure you can't manage! Measuring and collecting data is the at the center of any program implementation. Every project should require metric that are unique and align with the goal and purpose of the program. To make sure the metrics are aligned with the purpose and goal of the program the following three steps should be considered So that the project will work the goals should be understood To succeed and achieve the project goals, success factors should be determined and fulfilled Factors should be measured Methods for Measuring Success To accurately evaluate the chronic illness self-management program, we will use quantitative and qualitative techniques. During the qualitative evaluation, the project manager will analyze and identify the participants knowledge before going through the program and after the completion of the program (Paulheim, 2017). The success of the training provided by the public relations firm for code of ethics will be determined by analyzing how the staff responds to questions drawn from particular issues. During this analysis, project leaders and trainers will execute an assessment detailing key component of ethics and communication. The results of the assessment will determine if the training equip the team with the necessary knowledge to conduct business honestly and with integrity. Evaluation Methodologies Output of the program will also be evaluated based the response to questions regarding legal scenarios present to the participants during the training session (Wildemuth, 2016). These questions will require the trainers and instructors of the program to explain possible legal concepts either in a group setting or on individual basis. Additional analysis will be made by presenting individuals with a scenario to debate and the feedback from the debate will be used to determine their level of knowledge. After the training phase, each participant will take part in a simulation where each person will assume the role of the patients as well as the trainer. The project manager will evaluate each participant on how well he or she can handle given situations and give recommendation for improvements if needed. The results from the simulation will be used to determine how well the individual can perform the assigned duties in the program. Consequently, determining the success of the program. Data Gathering As previously mentioned, through different avenues such as interviews, observation, brainstorming, and questionnaires is how the data will be collected (Paradis et al., 2016). During the simulation, observation is the method that will be used. Observers and management will provide feed back based on the perception of the process. Additionally, mysteriou