• Home
  • Southern New Hampshire University
  • Human Behavior in Organizations OL500
  • Human Behavior in Organizations

Human Behavior in Organizations

Running head: MILESTONE THREE- ENGSTROM SOLUTION DEVELOPEMENT 1 Milestone Three- Engstrom Solution Development Bailey Torrez OL 500 -- Human Behavior in Organizations Southern New Hampshire University MILESTONE THREE- ENGSTROM SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT 2 Organizational Improvement Outcomes When the Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant faced a struggle in production in 1997 they implemented a motivational approach which consisted of company-wide bonuses based on productivity. This worked for seven years, until the market crashed and the company was no longer producing enough to sustain the profit needed to provide employees' their bonuses. Once this happened, Engstrom management faced disgruntled employees who were far from productive and motivated. Their rate of production had decreased, the quality of the product produced lessened, and there were even claims of thievery happening amongst employees from the company (Beer & Collins, 2008). At one point in time, the Scanlon Bonus Plan worked, but it was time to move away and develop a human based managerial approach. Decrease in employee motivation, lack of plant culture, little empowerment and lack of employee knowledge of the struggling economy led to these issues. If Engstrom can solve these human behavioral organizational problems, I believe they can once again, be profitable. Communication was strong when management sought to implement Scanlon's Plan. They made sure all employees knew what the plan entailed, how it would work and even took to a vote to determine if they wanted it or not. This standard of communication, however, was not the same when the economy began to tank. Bonuses never came, employees were laid off and the employees still working for the organization were not informed as to why these changes were happening. The downward communication of the current economic state would have been extremely beneficial (Newstrom, 2015, p. 65). By not communicating to their employees that the market had decreased and production needs had slowed, employees were left guessing why their bonuses never came. This generated rumors, anger and a hostile work environment. MILESTONE THREE- ENGSTROM SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT 3 Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant went from one of the best motivation strategies (companywide bonuses) to one of the 6 demotivating factors Newstrom (2015) acknowledges in his text, "Making false promises of incentives available" (pg. 116). But the biggest problem Engstrom had was that they relied solely on these bonuses to motivate their employees; there were no goals, no acknowledgment of needs, no schedule of reinforcement, no individual performance monitoring. It was time for Engstrom to admit the capability to pay bonuses was no longer feasible and develop a new way to motivate their employees. By developing a new way to motivate its employees, Engstrom should be able to decrease the poor quality and speed of employees' production. Strategic Action Engstrom cannot do anything about the down economy but if they take the steps necessary to keep employee morale and motivation high they can limit the destruction a recession takes on a company. Although additional money for great work is always top on the list, I have learned via