• Home
  • Southern New Hampshire University
  • Human Behavior in Organizations OL500
  • Human Behavior in Organizations - Case Analysis

Human Behavior in Organizations - Case Analysis

Case Analysis - Final Paper Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant: Motivating in Good Times or Bad Tasha Houston Southern New Hampshire University November 12, 2020 1| P age Abstract In this paper, I will explain how human behavior can affect the direction of an organization. I will further explain what were the reasons that caused the negative behaviors and give solutions to reversing those negative behaviors. In this paper I will analyze the case study of Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant, I will focus on how the company has existed for years and faced numerous organizational issues due to a lack of knowledge of the human behavior of motivation. Then I will analyze my personal work experience as it relates to organizational issues-particularly lack of motivation. I will offer up solutions to correct the organizational issues for Engstrom and my workplace experience. It is important to comprehend the importance of human behavior as a driving force behind the improvement of employee motivation, that's why both case studies were analyzed in this paper. 2 | P a g e I. Introduction Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant is a privately owned manufacturing company based in Richmond, Indiana that specializes in creating mirrors for automobiles. Engstrom experienced numerous organizational issues throughout the years in business, but this specific year they were heading towards a crisis. The organizational issues looming at Engstrom were productivity problems, product quality issues, distrust between employees and upper management, and low employee morale (Beer 2008). Engstrom had implemented The Scanlon family Incentive Plan some years prior due to a similar crisis, which caused employee low morale. This incentive plan was created to reward employees with paid bonuses for increased productivity (Beer 2008). This plan was an end to Engstrom's productivity issues and employee low morale or so management thought. The Scanlon Plan which was a 1930's concept, the heart of this concept was to increase participative management (Beer 2008). The three key plan components were; the submission of suggestions for improvement by employees at all levels, the structure of the company committees that evaluate the suggestions, and the sharing of the fruits of increased productivity through monthly bonuses (Beer 2008). With the Scanlon Plan implemented, the intended goals were reached. Morale at the plant was high, employee productivity increased and the quality of the products was in great shape. This winning streak only lasted for so long. Then a downturn hit the industry, Bent was forced to lay off twenty percent of the workforce. Employees who remained haven't received bonuses in seven months. The workers had been accustomed to the plan's substantial bonuses, but when the bonuses stop coming, employees responded with anger and suspicion, as if something that rightfully belonged to them had been taken away (Beer 2018). Now the employees felt under-rewarded for their efforts and realized other privileges were taken away. The reaction of the employees exhibits them being blindsided about the end of 3 |Page