• Home
  • Southern New Hampshire University
  • Principles of Epidemiology IHP330
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Healthcare Quality Improvement

SHORT PAPER: ACCREDITATION Short Paper: Accreditation Samantha Gilchrist IHP 604: Healthcare Quality Improvement Southern New Hampshire University June 2, 2019 Accredita on 2 Joshi. M., Nash, D.. Ransom E., & Ransom, S. (2014) use the definition of accreditatior as "a process by which an entity external to the organization providing goods or services evaluates that organization against a set of predetermined requirements or desirable attributes and publicly attests to the results." The function is thereby to standardize the norms of function and care provided by such individuals and organizations, so that minimum expectations are met across the board. In many instances; accreditation is a standard consumers look for when choosing services -- it portrays reliability that the goods provided will meet particular benchmarks. In healthcare, insurers and providers both depend on accreditation standards to define safe, quality care and to determine whether that is being practiced (Joshi, M. Nash, D. Ransom, E. & Ransom, S., 2014) Patient Safety Role The Joint Commission is the most well known accrediting body in the United States with the accreditation and certification of 21,000 health care organizations nationwide. The goal to meet appropriate performance standards are accompanied with the vision that "all people always experience the safest, highest quality, best value health care across all settings," (About the joint commission, 2019). In order to promote this ideal of safety, the accredition process involves criteria that must be met pertaining to safe patient identification, medication administration, infection prevention, and surgical mistakes, among others (The Joint Commission, 2019). The National Patient Safety Goals are established and reevaluated periodically. They focus on common discrepancies in the health care continuum and how to address them. They are measured during the survey process and when not met organizations are given a deadline to amend discrepancies with accreditation pending (The Joint Commission, 2019). Accreditation ensures that the minimum standard of patient safety is being met by an organization. Accredita on 3 NPSG and Joint Commission Survey Relationship The Joint Commission developed the National Patient Safety Goals in an effort to identify common issues within various healthcare organizations and streamline solutions. Some of these include correct patient identification, staff communication, medication safety, alarms, infection prevention, patient safety risks, and prevention of injury during surgery (The Joint Commission, 2019). During the Joint Commission accreditation survey, these safety goals are also evaluated. For example, the Boston VA Healthcare System meets all of the National Patient Safety Goals in the hospital setting by meeting all of the standards required by the Joint Commission (QualityCheck, 2018). An organization that meets the standards of the National Patient Safety Goals will generally achieve accreditation status. Consequences In few instances, an organization may not meet the benchmarks related to safety goals set by the Joint Commission. Upon completion of a survey, the Joint Commission gives the organization access to a summary report; if all criteria are met, accreditation is granted immediately. However, if an organization's summary includes requirements for improvement, these must be addressed by the allotted dat