ABTS3020 Group Presentation Criteria Introduction and conclusion (Group mark) (10%) Evidence of research on the ways in which others have made directors aware of their responsibilities (Individual mark) (20%) Consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally-diverse settings (Individual mark) (20%) Communication of overall understanding of legislative responsibilities (Individual mark) (20%) Effective verbal and non-verbal communication (Individual mark) (10%) Power point presentation and effective written communication (Group mark) (10%) Group cohesion (Group mark) (10%) 7 Concise, well-structured introduction &conclusions provided. Excellent purpose & main ideas of presentation explained Evidence of considerable research on the ways in which others have made directors aware of their responsibilities Highly appropriate and insightful consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally- diverse settings Communicates a considerable understanding of legislative responsibilities Articulate and engaging. Used notes well. Eye contact, voice projection and gestures excellent Simple, clear and easy to read. No grammar, spelling or punctuation errors. Excellent paraphrasing and referencing Excellent timing and transitions between speakers. Questions demonstrated understanding well. 6 Well-structured introduction and conclusions provided. Purpose and main ideas of presentation explained very well Evidence of thorough research on the ways in which others have made directors aware of their responsibilities Appropriate and insightful consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally- diverse settings Communicates a thorough understanding of legislative responsibilities Articulate and engaging. Used notes. Eye contact, voice projection and gestures consistent Simple, clear and easy to read. No grammar, spelling or punctuation errors. Very good paraphrasing and referencing Smooth timing and transitions between speakers. Questions demonstrated understanding 5 Clear introduction and conclusions provided. Clear purpose and main ideas of presentation explained Evidence of mostly informed research on the ways in which others have made directors aware of their responsibilities Appropriate consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally-diverse settings Communicates a mostly informed understanding of legislative responsibilities Engaging. Used notes. Eye contact, voice projection or gestures very good Simple and clear. Minimal grammar, spelling or punctuation errors. Good paraphrasing and referencing Evident timing and transitions between speakers. Satisfactory questions provided 4 Sound introduction and conclusions provided. Main ideas of presentation explained satisfactorily Evidence of satisfactory research on the ways in which others have made directors aware of their Basic consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally- diverse settings Communicates a satisfactory understanding of legislative responsibilities Sound presentation. Great attempt at consistent eye contact, voice projection and gestures Generally clear. Some grammar, spelling or punctuation errors. Sound attempts at paraphrasing and referencing Timing and transition efforts made. Questions provided 3 Introduction and conclusions attempted but at times irrelevant/ unclear or missing structure or main ideas. Evidence of superficial research on the ways in which others have made directors aware responsibilities Superficial consideration of how plain English principles might apply to training in culturally- diverse settings Communicates a superficial understanding of legislative responsibilities Good effort but please practise presentation techniques. Nonverbal. communication didn't