• Home
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Real Property LLB301
  • Native Title Law and Real Property Analysis

Native Title Law and Real Property Analysis

QUT Law LLB301 REAL PROPERTY LAW: Sem 1 2022 Problem Solving Task Criteria and Standards for Grading Criteria Understanding and analysis 10% CLO: Identify and explain fundamental principles related to real property law in Queensland, including the significance of Native Title interests in land CLO: Advise on contemporary legal issues relating to land by applying your skills in statutory interpretation and case law analysis Structure 5% CLO: Communicate analysis and reasoning effectively in written form High Distinction The answer very clearly and accurately explains how Native Title law applies in the problem scenario. The effect of key cases are very clearly and accurately presented. 8.5-10 Organisation is very clear and logical. . The structure assiststhe reader to understand how different issues relateto each other. Clear signalling is used. Distinction The answer clearly and mostly accurately explains how Native Title law applies in the problem scenario. The effect of key cases are clearly and accurately presented. 7.5-8 Organisation is logical. The structure generally assists thereader to understand how different issues relate to each other. Mostly clear signallingis used. 4.5-5 4 Credit The answer somewhat clearly and mostly accurately explains how Native Title law applies in the problem scenario. The effect of key cases are somewhat clearly and accurately presented. There may be some errors. 6.5-7 Organisation is generally logical. The structure generally assists the reader to understand how different issues relate to each other, however there is room to improve. Pass The answer provides some limited guidance on how Native Title law applies in the problem scenario. The effect of key cases are not explained accurately or clearly. 5-6 An organisational pattern is attempted but is difficult to follow. 3.5 2.5-3 Fail The answer fails to provide accurate guidance on how Native Title law applies in the problem scenario. 0-4.5 Poor organisation of material and is not suitable for a client letter. 0-2 ---- Style 5% CLO: Communicate analysis and reasoning effectively in written form The writing style is clear and effective (clear and concise English, succinct sentences, professional register): terminology is audience appropriate (avoidance of jargon; correct use of gender inclusive language; awareness of cross- cultural communication issues). 4.5-5 The writing style is proficient and professional with only minor lapses in expression. Terminology is audience appropriate (avoidance of jargon; correct use of gender inclusive language; awareness of cross-cultural communication issues). 4 The writing style is competent and mostly easy to read though with some distracting errors or poor style choices in terms of language choices and suitability of terminology for audience. 3.5 The writing style is generally adequate in conveying an intended message but communication would be enhanced through greater attention to matters such as word choice, sentence construction and audience needs. 2.5-3 The writing style detracts from readability and appropriateness for purpose and audience (for example over-simplistic, technical or verbose expression; long confused sentences, sexist or discriminatory language). 0-2 a university for the real world