LLB301 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2023 Problem Solving Task Problem You are approached by Katrina, a representative of an Indigenous group from Northwest Queensland. The group is considering making a Native Title claim over an area of land. The claim will be for various rights, including to access the land, engage in ceremonies, camp, fish, and collect fauna. Katrina advises you that the group currently conducts all these activities, and that they have a right to do so under their laws and customs. Katrina knows that these rights are all the type of rights that can be recognised under Native Title and is confident that the group can demonstrate that they currently possess these rights. However, Katrina has been informed that under Native Title law, it is not sufficient for the group to be able to show that they currently possess these rights. She has been informed that the group is also required to show that they possessed these rights historically. To support a successful claim of Native Title over the land, Katrina wants to know: · what her group will need to demonstrate in relation to their possession of these rights historically, and · how that could be demonstrated. Task Write a 600-word letter to your client explaining what the law says in relation to this inquiry. Katrina and other members of the group are familiar with the concept of Native Title rights, so you do not need to explain how Native Title law came to be recognised in Australia. This means you do not need to explain the central findings of Mabo No. 2 and the content of s223 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), other than as it relates to Katrina's specific questions. Katrina is interested in understanding how case law affects the legal principles described in your letter. Therefore, you may include some discussion of key case law authority, but if you do you will need to explain those cases in a way that can be understood by non-lawyers. You are only asked to address this specific element of Native Title law. Therefore, you are not required to explain other aspects of Native Title law, like extinguishment, what types of rights are recognised, the difference between exclusive and non-exclusive rights, compensation for loss of Native Title rights, nor Indigenous Land Use Agreements. Further, while you should discuss what types of evidence could be used by Katrina's group, you should not discuss the content of the laws of evidence. Further instructions . You should be careful to write to the needs of your audience. You should note that the group you are writing for does not have formal legal training, however, does possess knowledge about the fundamental concepts of Native Title law in Australia. · Your client has stated that she prefers to be addressed as 'Katrina'. · When writing to a lay audience, you would not usually include footnotes. However, because of this group's particular knowledge and interest, you should use footnotes to properly reference cases and