- Terrains Fields - Winter 2014 - Hiver 2014 - Domestic Abuse of Women and Restorative Justice in Nunavut 2012 Casualties of Heritage Distancing: Children, Ch'orti' Indigeneity, and the Copan Archaeoscape. Current Anthropology 53: 80-107. McKillop, Heather. 2006 The Ancient Maya. New York: W.W.Nortin & Company. Mortensen, Lena. 2009 Copan Past and Present: Maya Archaeological Tourism and the Ch'orti' in Honduras. In The Ch'orti' Maya Area, Brent E. Metz, Cameron L. McNeil and Kerry M. Hull (eds.) Gainesville: University of Florida Press, pp. 246-257. Patterson, Thomas C. 1995 Archaeology, History Indigenismo, and the State in Peru and Mexico. In Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, Peter R. Schmidt and Thomas C. Patterson (eds.) Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 69-85. UNESCO World Heritage Convention. 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris : United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Maythe Han Introduction: Domestic Abuse of Women in Nunavut Statistically, Nunavut has the highest rate of family violence in Canada. Compared to those who live in Ontario, the province with the lowest rate of family violence, those who live in Nunavut are 17 times more likely to be victims of domestic violence (Durrant 2013, 5). According to police-reported data, out of 1132 cases of domestic violence, more than 500 Nunavum- miut - of which 85.4% are Inuit (Statistics Canada 2011) - were victims of spousal vio- lence in 2010 (Durrant 2013:5). According to the study conducted in 2013, Measuring Violence against Women: Statistical Trends, the prevalence of sexual offences in Nunavut was 12 times higher than the provincial aver- age (Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics 2013). The same study stated that Nunavut had nearly 13 times as many cases of violence against women compared to the national av- erage (Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics 2013). Given this statistical information, this paper will examine and explain possible factors that may contribute to such a high number of cases of domestic abuse, justify the concept of restorative justice as a possible solution that could help reduce the preva- lence of domestic abuse in Nunavut, and explore the critiques of restorative justice in the following sections. Precipitators of Domestic Violence There are many factors that are said to have contributed to the extremely high rates of domestic violence among Inuit today. For one, it is argued by many that forced resettlement by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (henceforth referred to as RCMP) resulted in an imbalance between gender roles with which the Inuit lived and functioned, leading to gender-related crimes such as domestic abuse (Billson 2006:74; Morgan 2008:4). The resettlement process involved small RCMP planes that did not allow Inuit men to bring their large hunting equipment, dogs, and sleds, which were all necessary things for them to carry out their role as a provider, whereas Inuit women were able to bring what constituted their living, such as sewing materials and other small household items (Billson 2006:74). For men, resettlement brought