• Home
  • Aston University
  • Introduction to Studying and Researching Politics
  • The Role of Constitutions and the Rule of Law in Democracies

The Role of Constitutions and the Rule of Law in Democracies

Elections and democracy Constitution Rule of law Gina Miller 1 (2017) Gina Miller 11 (2019) Risks to Rule of law Democracy and its institutions - majority voting bloc oppresses a minority e.g. African Americans in the segregation era - Elections are no guarantee of liberal values and political stability; electoral violence in Kenya. New/incomplete democracies e.g. breakup of Yugoslavia - Future for china- from one party to. - Constitution: set of rules, written and unwritten. Seeks to establish duties, powers and functions of various government. - Purpose: bring stability, order and predictability of the workings of government, protect individuals from state - Can be classified on basis of the their rule, how easily it can be changed, the degree to which their rules is observed in practice - Work in certain conditions: when they correspond to and are supported by political culture - Separation of law from politics is achieved through attempts to make judiciary independent and impartial. Judicial independence is threatened by close involvement of political bodies. - Judge imposes meaning of law, cant be involved in policy process - English constitution praised in the 18th century for its separation of powers (executive, legislative, judicial) - Constitution rely on the legal system - Courts are there to defend individuals against state/representatives - Did the government need an act of parliament to trigger EU withdrawal after the referendum? - Theresa May's government argued it wasn't necessary because of 'Royal prerogative' - Gina Miller and her lawyers argued act of parliament necessary because EU withdrawal changes UK law and UK residents' rights - Supreme Court ruled against government 8 -3 - Can government suspend parliament and for how long - Boris argues is part of Royal prerogative - Miller and her lawyers argue government cannot suspend parliament without a good reason - Supreme Court would against government 11- 0 - Checks and balances provide institutional safeguards for the functioning of democracy - But the constitution also depends on people who exercise different functions and public support for them - Courts can lose public confidence if seen as politicized - Accusing legal system of political bias is a common tactic of Authoritarian leaders I .e. attack institution not the decisions - Aims to weaken support for independent institutions