• Home
  • University of Lincoln
  • Contract Law
  • Objective vs Subjective Intent in Contract Law

Objective vs Subjective Intent in Contract Law

Subjective Objective Examines the mind of the party Examines external factors Considers party's intention Considers the reasonable intention Evaluates party's understanding Evaluates reasonable view · Parties can forget their true intentions. . Parties can present versions of events which is favourable to them at the time of dispute. · Intentions are difficult to decipher accurately. . It is easier to adopt an objective approach and make judgments based on what was said and done. Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 1 WLR 1403 or 3 All ER 824 Per Lord Denning In contracts, you do not look into the actual intent in a man's mind. You look at what he said and did. A contract is formed when there is, to all outward appearances, a contract. A man cannot get out of a contract by saying: 'I did not intend to contract', if by his words he has done so. RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller [2010] UKSC 14 Per Lord Clarke Whether there is a binding contract between the parties and, if so, upon what terms depends upon what they have agreed. It depends not upon their subjective state of mind, but upon a consideration of what was communicated between them by words or conduct ... . It is about appearance of an agreement. . Otherwise, there would always be the risk that a party meant something different from what was said and done. · The objective approach enhances certainty and reliance. . But, are there implications for the notion of consensus ad idem, if subjective intentions are not considered? There are situations where the courts will consider a party's subjective view as well, examples · Mistake · Misrepresentation A mistake occurs when a party's subjective view of the agreement does not match the objective approach. A misrepresentation is a mistake that was induced by something said or done by the other party. . Contracts usually exist in the commercial world. . The rules of contract law can have broad economic influence. · Economic efficiency and consequences are relevant. · Prices, transaction costs, risk allocation etc. are affected by contract law. . Notions of social and political theory can also be relevant in analysing contracts and contract law. . Example, the ideology of 'Freedom of contract'. . There are ideologies that might underpin the courts' analysis and decisions on contractual issues. . Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists [1953] 1 QB 401 . Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 All ER 972 . Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824