Philosophy of Science Albert Einstein Realist Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Greetings my fellow Intellectuals. As you may know, I am Albert Einstein! Personally, I have a vast background in physics and mathematics where, for example, I have published four papers such as on Special Relativity, the equivalence of matter and energy, the dual nature of light as waves and particles and lastly the Brownian motion, the movement of particles through a fluid. In addition to this, I also received a Nobel Prize for my work in Physics in 1921 concerning my services to theoretical physics and my discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect. Nonetheless, I would firstly like to note that I am not certain to what extent the universe is deterministic and to what extent it is stochastic (randomly determined) and that we are still discovering the universe we live in and therefore we must analyse any theory that is mind- boggling like this quantum mechanics theory we are discussing today at this conference. This theory is at least an experimentally confirmed empirical theory, but the structural features make it inherently incomplete. To begin with, how this theory is incomplete, I will first speak on the concept of randomness. Randomness can appear as some form of statistical behaviour, but it cannot be a part of the law; for example, a pack of cards that are shuffled according to deterministic laws still shows a random arrangement. Also, it is possible to take advantage of the universally accepted laws of conservation of energy and the impulse-momentum to obtain information on the state of a
particle in a process of interference which (according to the principle of indeterminacy/complementarity) should not be accessible! In addition to this my research on Relativity has taught us that all interactions had to propagate at a finite speed and of nonlocality (the apparent ability of objects to instantaneously know about each other's state, even when separated by large distances) as if the universe at large instantaneously arranges its particles in anticipation of future events. Secondly, the quantum mechanics theory can describe nature on an atomic level but not as a useful basis for the whole of physics. Describing reality required firm predictions followed by direct observations but individual quantum interactions cannot be observed directly which leaves quantum physicists no choice but to predict the probability that events will occur which can be clouded by biases. Lastly, I will speak of the Ensemble interpretation. While each event does have a probability such as rolling snake eyes in a game of dice, using, and developing a philosophical position based on single events is silly as the universe is an ensemble of many events. Taking Take Schrodinger's Cat, for example, you can only believe that the statistical probability of the cat being dead or alive applies only if there is a large number of cats in boxes. Then we can predict how many of the cats will be alive and how many will be dead after a given