• Home
  • Goldsmiths University of London
  • Dissertation
  • Rhetorical Strategies in Ethnographic Research

Rhetorical Strategies in Ethnographic Research

informs. Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince Author(s): Karen Golden-Biddle and Karen Locke Source: Organization Science, Nov., 1993, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Nov., 1993), pp. 595-616 Published by: INFORMS Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635082 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms INFORMS is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Organization Science JSTOR This content downloaded from 000000000005.151.220.193 on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:17:32 +00:00000000000000 ORGANIZATION SCIENCE Vol. 4, No. 4, November 1993 Printed in U.S.A. APPEALING WORK: AN INVESTIGATION OF HOW ETHNOGRAPHIC TEXTS CONVINCE* KAREN GOLDEN-BIDDLE AND KAREN LOCKE Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23186 This paper examines how written research accounts based on ethnography appeal to readers to find them convincing. In particular, it highlights the role of rhetoric in the readers' interaction with and interpretation of the accounts. Extending relevant work in the litera- tures of organization studies, anthropology and literary criticism, the paper develops three dimensions-authenticity, plausibility and criticality-central to the process of convincing. Further, through the analysis of a sample of ethnographic articles, it discloses the particular writing practices and more general strategies that make claims on readers to engage the texts and to accept that these three dimensions have been achieved. Through authenticity, ethnographic texts appeal to readers to accept that the researcher was indeed present in the field and grasped how the members understood their world. Strategies to achieve authenticity include: particularizing everyday life, delineating the relationship between the researcher and organization members, depicting the disciplined pursuit and analysis of data, and qualifying personal biases. Through plausibility, ethnographic texts make claims on readers to accept that the findings make a distinctive contribution to issues of common concern. Plausibility is accomplished by strategies that normalize unorthodox methodologies, recruit the reader, legitimate atypical situations, smooth contestable assertions, build dramatic anticipation, and differentiate the findings. Finally, through criticality, ethnographic texts endeavor to probe readers to re-examine the taken-for-granted assumptions that underly their work. Strategies to achieve criticality include: carving out room to reflect, provoking the recognition and examination of differences, and enabling readers to imagine new possibilities. The empirical analyses, which highlight both the rhetorical and substantive aspects of convincing, suggest that at a minimum ethnographic texts must achieve both authenticity and plausibility-that is, they must convey the vitality and uniqueness of the field situation and also build their case for the particular contribution of the findings to a disciplinary area of common interest. These analyses also suggest that the most provocative task and promising potential of ethnography is the use of richly-grounded data to not only reflect on the members' world, but more