00:01
Okay, so this question is asking about a study done where they found that users of oral contraceptives have higher rates of cervical cancer than non -users.
00:12
And it's, it concluded that basically the pill causes cervical cancer.
00:18
So part of it is asking if this is a observational study or a controlled experiment, and it is an observational study.
00:28
And the reason for this is because the investigators aren't actually putting any kind of treatment on subjects and looking at the effects.
00:39
They're just observing data that's already around them, and they're just analyzing data that they see around them.
00:45
They're not actually putting any kind of treatment on subjects and looking at their effects.
00:51
So it's definitely an observational study.
00:54
Part b is saying, why did the investigators adjust for age, education, marital status and that's to avoid what's known as confounding factors and confounding factors are essentially outside factors that may affect what you see they may affect your results and if they exist then you can't really be sure you they might have affected your results and you can't really be sure that in this case you couldn't really be sure that use of oral contraceptives has an effect on rate of cervical cancer if you don't adjust for age, education, neurocitis.
01:34
Because if you don't adjust for these, then these factors might really be the cause behind the rates of cervical cancer, not actually the use of oral contraceptives.
01:44
Parcée is asking, saying, women using the pill were likely to differ from non -users on another factor, which affects the risk of cervical cancer.
01:52
What factor is that? and that factor is going to be sexual activity.
02:00
Because women who use the pill are more likely to have more...