00:02
This figure shows the effect of the minimum wage.
00:07
In the absence of the minimum wage, the market wage would be w1 and q1 workers would be employed.
00:16
With the minimum wage, wm, imposed above w1, the market wage is wm and the number of employed workers is q2.
00:37
Q3 is the number of workers.
00:42
That are willing to be employed at this minimum wage, but they can't.
00:56
Therefore, we have unemployment, which is the difference between q3 and q2.
01:13
Total wage payments to workers are shown as the area of rectangle a, b, c, d.
01:27
So this is a, b, c and d.
01:50
And this area equals wm times q2.
02:03
That is part a of the question.
02:07
For part b, b and c actually, assume there is an increase in the minimum wage.
02:17
We can draw another line.
02:21
Let's say wm prime is the new minimum wage.
02:32
Now the number of workers would be employed.
02:35
Are q2 prime and the number of workers that are willing to work is q3 prime.
02:49
You can see that the difference between these two quantities increase.
02:55
So the new level of unemployment is q3 prime minus q2 prime that is greater than the initial unemployment when we first impose the minimum wage.
03:18
The size of the effect of a higher minimum wage on employment depends only on the elasticity of demand.
03:30
The elasticity of supply does not matter because there is a surplus of labor.
03:44
Let me write down for part b, employment decrease.
03:51
For part c, unemployment, increase.
03:55
The size of the rise in unemployment depends on both the elasticity of supply and demand.
04:06
The elasticity of demand determines the change in the quantity of labor demanded, and the elasticity of supply determines the change in the quantity of labor supplied...